From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Hao Dongdong <doubled@leap-io-kernel.com>,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, doubled@leap-io-kernel.com,
yjzhang@leap-io-kernel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: leapraid: Add new scsi driver
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 21:38:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511182038.XDtPzsLQ-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251116112803.28078-1-doubled@leap-io-kernel.com>
Hi Hao,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on jejb-scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on mkp-scsi/for-next linus/master v6.18-rc6 next-20251117]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Hao-Dongdong/scsi-leapraid-Add-new-scsi-driver/20251116-192921
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251116112803.28078-1-doubled%40leap-io-kernel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4] scsi: leapraid: Add new scsi driver
config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251118/202511182038.XDtPzsLQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251118/202511182038.XDtPzsLQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511182038.XDtPzsLQ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/scsi/leapraid/leapraid_func.c:4794:2: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
4794 | default:
| ^
drivers/scsi/leapraid/leapraid_func.c:4794:2: note: insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through
4794 | default:
| ^
| break;
1 warning generated.
vim +4794 drivers/scsi/leapraid/leapraid_func.c
4741
4742 static void leapraid_fw_work(struct leapraid_adapter *adapter,
4743 struct leapraid_fw_evt_work *fw_evt)
4744 {
4745 struct leapraid_sas_dev *sas_dev;
4746
4747 adapter->fw_evt_s.cur_evt = fw_evt;
4748 leapraid_del_fw_evt_from_list(adapter, fw_evt);
4749 if (adapter->access_ctrl.host_removing ||
4750 adapter->access_ctrl.pcie_recovering) {
4751 leapraid_fw_evt_put(fw_evt);
4752 adapter->fw_evt_s.cur_evt = NULL;
4753 return;
4754 }
4755 switch (fw_evt->evt_type) {
4756 case LEAPRAID_EVT_SAS_DISCOVERY:
4757 {
4758 struct leapraid_evt_data_sas_disc *evt_data;
4759
4760 evt_data = fw_evt->evt_data;
4761 if (evt_data->reason_code ==
4762 LEAPRAID_EVT_SAS_DISC_RC_STARTED &&
4763 !adapter->dev_topo.card.phys_num)
4764 leapraid_sas_host_add(adapter, 0);
4765 break;
4766 }
4767 case LEAPRAID_EVT_SAS_TOPO_CHANGE_LIST:
4768 leapraid_sas_topo_chg_evt(adapter, fw_evt);
4769 break;
4770 case LEAPRAID_EVT_IR_CHANGE:
4771 leapraid_sas_ir_chg_evt(adapter, fw_evt);
4772 break;
4773 case LEAPRAID_EVT_SAS_ENCL_DEV_STATUS_CHANGE:
4774 leapraid_sas_enc_dev_stat_chg_evt(adapter, fw_evt);
4775 break;
4776 case LEAPRAID_EVT_REMOVE_DEAD_DEV:
4777 while (scsi_host_in_recovery(adapter->shost) ||
4778 adapter->access_ctrl.shost_recovering) {
4779 if (adapter->access_ctrl.host_removing ||
4780 adapter->fw_evt_s.fw_evt_cleanup)
4781 goto out;
4782
4783 ssleep(1);
4784 }
4785 leapraid_hardreset_async_logic(adapter);
4786 break;
4787 case LEAPRAID_EVT_TURN_ON_PFA_LED:
4788 sas_dev = leapraid_get_sas_dev_by_hdl(adapter,
4789 fw_evt->dev_handle);
4790 leapraid_set_led(adapter, sas_dev, true);
4791 break;
4792 case LEAPRAID_EVT_SCAN_DEV_DONE:
4793 adapter->scan_dev_desc.scan_start = false;
> 4794 default:
4795 break;
4796 }
4797 out:
4798 leapraid_fw_evt_put(fw_evt);
4799 adapter->fw_evt_s.cur_evt = NULL;
4800 }
4801
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 11:28 [PATCH v4] scsi: leapraid: Add new scsi driver Hao Dongdong
2025-11-18 13:38 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511182038.XDtPzsLQ-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=doubled@leap-io-kernel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yjzhang@leap-io-kernel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox