From: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Justin Tee <justintee8345@gmail.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: rework lpfc_sli4_fcf_rr_next_index_get()
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 18:58:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251205235808.358258-1-yury.norov@gmail.com> (raw)
The function opencodes for_each_set_bit_wrap(). Use it, and while there
switch from goto-driven codeflow to more high-level constructions.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov (NVIDIA) <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250917141806.661826-1-yury.norov@gmail.com/
v2: tweak check against LPFC_FCF_FLOGI_FAILED flag (Justin);
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 62 +++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index 7ea7c4245c69..c330db3e54dc 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -20361,62 +20361,36 @@ lpfc_check_next_fcf_pri_level(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
uint16_t
lpfc_sli4_fcf_rr_next_index_get(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
{
- uint16_t next_fcf_index;
+ uint16_t next;
-initial_priority:
- /* Search start from next bit of currently registered FCF index */
- next_fcf_index = phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx;
-
-next_priority:
- /* Determine the next fcf index to check */
- next_fcf_index = (next_fcf_index + 1) % LPFC_SLI4_FCF_TBL_INDX_MAX;
- next_fcf_index = find_next_bit(phba->fcf.fcf_rr_bmask,
- LPFC_SLI4_FCF_TBL_INDX_MAX,
- next_fcf_index);
+ do {
+ for_each_set_bit_wrap(next, phba->fcf.fcf_rr_bmask,
+ LPFC_SLI4_FCF_TBL_INDX_MAX, phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx) {
+ if (next == phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx)
+ continue;
- /* Wrap around condition on phba->fcf.fcf_rr_bmask */
- if (next_fcf_index >= LPFC_SLI4_FCF_TBL_INDX_MAX) {
- /*
- * If we have wrapped then we need to clear the bits that
- * have been tested so that we can detect when we should
- * change the priority level.
- */
- next_fcf_index = find_first_bit(phba->fcf.fcf_rr_bmask,
- LPFC_SLI4_FCF_TBL_INDX_MAX);
- }
+ if (!(phba->fcf.fcf_pri[next].fcf_rec.flag & LPFC_FCF_FLOGI_FAILED)) {
+ lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_FIP,
+ "2845 Get next roundrobin failover FCF (x%x)\n", next);
+ return next;
+ }
+ if (list_is_singular(&phba->fcf.fcf_pri_list))
+ return LPFC_FCOE_FCF_NEXT_NONE;
+ }
- /* Check roundrobin failover list empty condition */
- if (next_fcf_index >= LPFC_SLI4_FCF_TBL_INDX_MAX ||
- next_fcf_index == phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx) {
/*
* If next fcf index is not found check if there are lower
* Priority level fcf's in the fcf_priority list.
* Set up the rr_bmask with all of the avaiable fcf bits
* at that level and continue the selection process.
*/
- if (lpfc_check_next_fcf_pri_level(phba))
- goto initial_priority;
- lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_WARNING, LOG_FIP,
- "2844 No roundrobin failover FCF available\n");
-
- return LPFC_FCOE_FCF_NEXT_NONE;
- }
-
- if (next_fcf_index < LPFC_SLI4_FCF_TBL_INDX_MAX &&
- phba->fcf.fcf_pri[next_fcf_index].fcf_rec.flag &
- LPFC_FCF_FLOGI_FAILED) {
- if (list_is_singular(&phba->fcf.fcf_pri_list))
- return LPFC_FCOE_FCF_NEXT_NONE;
+ } while (lpfc_check_next_fcf_pri_level(phba));
- goto next_priority;
- }
-
- lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_FIP,
- "2845 Get next roundrobin failover FCF (x%x)\n",
- next_fcf_index);
+ lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_WARNING, LOG_FIP,
+ "2844 No roundrobin failover FCF available\n");
- return next_fcf_index;
+ return LPFC_FCOE_FCF_NEXT_NONE;
}
/**
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-12-05 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 23:58 Yury Norov (NVIDIA) [this message]
2025-12-08 23:06 ` [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: rework lpfc_sli4_fcf_rr_next_index_get() Justin Tee
2025-12-17 2:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-01-04 21:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251205235808.358258-1-yury.norov@gmail.com \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dick.kennedy@broadcom.com \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=justintee8345@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox