From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Xingui Yang" <yangxingui@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] scsi: libsas: Add linkrate and sas_addr change detection in rediscover
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 02:57:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623025715.569241F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623024304.714582-3-yangxingui@huawei.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] `sas_dev_is_flutter()` improperly bypasses PHY discovery when `child_dev` is NULL, failing to update the libsas routing table and PHY state.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Attempting to prevent UAF by acquiring a reference via `kref_get(&child_dev->kref)` results in a TOCTOU race because `sas_find_dev_by_rphy()` returns a raw pointer without holding a reference.
--
commit 4a9be29a10948d7f2b0efa1425b3ea27e6c08b1f
Author: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
scsi: libsas: Add linkrate and sas_addr change detection in rediscover
This commit introduces sas_dev_is_flutter() and sas_rediscover_ex_phy()
to improve flutter and device replace detection during rediscovery.
It holds a kref on the child device during SMP discovery and uses async
discovery to avoid ordering issues.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> index cb9d3b7482225..63d033e789855 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1966,6 +1966,78 @@ static bool dev_type_flutter(enum sas_device_type new, enum sas_device_type old)
[ ... ]
> +static bool sas_dev_is_flutter(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id,
> + u8 *sas_addr, enum sas_device_type type)
> +{
> + struct expander_device *ex = &dev->ex_dev;
> + struct ex_phy *phy = &ex->ex_phy[phy_id];
> + struct domain_device *child_dev = NULL;
> + char *action = "";
> + int res;
> +
> + if (SAS_ADDR(sas_addr) != SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr) ||
> + !dev_type_flutter(type, phy->attached_dev_type))
> + return false;
> +
> + child_dev = sas_ex_to_dev(dev, phy_id);
> + if (!child_dev)
> + goto out;
[Severity: Medium]
In the original code, sas_ex_phy_discover() was called unconditionally.
Will this new early return bypass the SMP request that updates the PHY state
(via sas_set_ex_phy()) when the child device is not instantiated or has been
removed?
> +
> + kref_get(&child_dev->kref);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could attempting to prevent a use-after-free
by acquiring a reference here result in a time-of-check to time-of-use
(TOCTOU) race?
Looking at sas_find_dev_by_rphy() (called by sas_ex_to_dev()), it acquires
port->dev_list_lock, finds the device, and drops the lock before returning
the raw pointer:
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c:sas_find_dev_by_rphy() {
...
found_dev = dev;
spin_unlock(&port->dev_list_lock);
goto found;
...
}
If a concurrent link-loss or device removal event runs, can it acquire the
lock, remove the device, and drop its last reference before we call
kref_get(&child_dev->kref) here, leading to a use-after-free?
> + res = sas_ex_phy_discover(dev, phy_id);
> + if (res)
> + goto out_put;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623024304.714582-1-yangxingui@huawei.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 2:43 [PATCH v8 0/2] libsas: rediscover improvements for linkrate/sas_addr changes Xingui Yang
2026-06-23 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] scsi: libsas: refactor sas_ex_to_ata() using new helper sas_ex_to_dev() Xingui Yang
2026-06-23 2:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] scsi: libsas: Add linkrate and sas_addr change detection in rediscover Xingui Yang
2026-06-23 2:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 8:39 ` Jason Yan
2026-06-23 8:52 ` Jason Yan
2026-06-24 6:16 ` yangxingui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623025715.569241F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox