From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yousef Alhouseen" <alhouseenyousef@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: 3w-xxxx: sanitize passthrough SGLs
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:26:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625092651.4CFA11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625085842.4522-2-alhouseenyousef@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The DMA buffer is freed while the hardware may still be actively writing to it on timeout failure paths.
--
commit 046079df1a1f193432bc739db902b2c478f12b8c
Author: Yousef Alhouseen <alhouseenyousef@gmail.com>
scsi: 3w-xxxx: sanitize passthrough SGLs
TW_CMD_PACKET_WITH_DATA accepts a command packet from userspace and
patches only the first SGL entry before posting it to the controller. The
command size and remaining SGL contents can still describe user-controlled
DMA descriptors to firmware.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c b/drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c
> index c68678fa72c1e..58bab58083c08 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -966,17 +967,31 @@ static long tw_chrdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long a
> /* Load the sg list */
> switch (TW_SGL_OUT(tw_ioctl->firmware_command.opcode__sgloffset)) {
> case 2:
> + memset(tw_ioctl->firmware_command.byte8.param.sgl, 0,
> + sizeof(tw_ioctl->firmware_command.byte8.param.sgl));
> + tw_ioctl->firmware_command.size = 4;
> tw_ioctl->firmware_command.byte8.param.sgl[0].address = dma_handle + sizeof(TW_New_Ioctl);
> tw_ioctl->firmware_command.byte8.param.sgl[0].length = data_buffer_length_adjusted;
> break;
> case 3:
> + memset(tw_ioctl->firmware_command.byte8.io.sgl, 0,
> + sizeof(tw_ioctl->firmware_command.byte8.io.sgl));
> + tw_ioctl->firmware_command.size = 5;
> tw_ioctl->firmware_command.byte8.io.sgl[0].address = dma_handle + sizeof(TW_New_Ioctl);
> tw_ioctl->firmware_command.byte8.io.sgl[0].length = data_buffer_length_adjusted;
> break;
> case 5:
> + memset(passthru->sg_list, 0, sizeof(passthru->sg_list));
> + passthru->size = 7;
> passthru->sg_list[0].address = dma_handle + sizeof(TW_New_Ioctl);
> passthru->sg_list[0].length = data_buffer_length_adjusted;
> break;
> + default:
> + retval = -EINVAL;
> + tw_dev->chrdev_request_id = TW_IOCTL_CHRDEV_FREE;
> + tw_state_request_finish(tw_dev, request_id);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(tw_dev->host->host_lock, flags);
> + goto out2;
> }
>
> memcpy(tw_dev->command_packet_virtual_address[request_id], &(tw_ioctl->firmware_command), sizeof(TW_Command));
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does tw_chrdev_ioctl() have a use-after-free
risk when handling command timeouts?
If wait_event_timeout() times out and tw_reset_device_extension() fails, the
driver jumps to out2 and calls dma_free_coherent() on the ioctl buffer:
tw_chrdev_ioctl() {
...
timeout = wait_event_timeout(tw_dev->ioctl_wqueue,
tw_dev->chrdev_request_id == TW_IOCTL_CHRDEV_FREE,
timeout);
if (tw_dev->chrdev_request_id != TW_IOCTL_CHRDEV_FREE) {
retval = -EIO;
if (tw_reset_device_extension(tw_dev)) {
goto out2;
}
}
...
out2:
dma_free_coherent(..., cpu_addr, dma_handle);
}
Since the hardware was not successfully reset, couldn't the controller still
be actively performing DMA writes to this freed page after it is returned to
the page allocator?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260625085842.4522-1-alhouseenyousef@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 8:58 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: 3w-9xxx: sanitize passthrough SGLs Yousef Alhouseen
2026-06-25 8:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: 3w-xxxx: " Yousef Alhouseen
2026-06-25 9:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: 3w-9xxx: " sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 " Yousef Alhouseen
2026-06-25 14:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: 3w-xxxx: " Yousef Alhouseen
2026-06-25 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260625092651.4CFA11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alhouseenyousef@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox