From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: ipr: use kmalloc() to allocate IPR dump buffer memory
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:28:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630112901.0DD1E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630-b4-scsi-v1-3-494fb37ebe7b@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Switching from __get_free_page() to kmalloc() for bulk PAGE_SIZE allocations worsens memory fragmentation resilience and increases the likelihood of allocation failure.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unnecessary use of GFP_ATOMIC in a fully sleepable context drains atomic memory reserves and causes large allocations to fail.
--
commit 031dbb9ad5b7614bab879909db8f301be9752516
Author: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
scsi: ipr: use kmalloc() to allocate IPR dump buffer memory
This commit replaces __get_free_page() and free_page() with kmalloc() and
kfree() for allocating the IPR dump buffer. The goal is to provide a cleaner
API without requiring casts or tracking the allocation size during free.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/635405e4-9423-4a25-a6e7-e03c8ea0bcbe@redhat.com
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
> index d207e5e81afe0..5a212bfdeec2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
> @@ -2893,7 +2893,7 @@ static int ipr_sdt_copy(struct ipr_ioa_cfg *ioa_cfg,
> (ioa_dump->hdr.len + bytes_copied) < max_dump_size) {
> if (ioa_dump->page_offset >= PAGE_SIZE ||
> ioa_dump->page_offset == 0) {
> - page = (__be32 *)__get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
> + page = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this allocation actually need to use
GFP_ATOMIC?
Looking at ipr_sdt_copy(), the allocation happens in a loop that explicitly
yields the CPU by calling schedule() at the end of each iteration. No spinlocks
are held across the allocation (host_lock is acquired later). Since the context
appears to be fully sleepable, using GFP_ATOMIC to allocate up to 80MB of memory
unnecessarily drains emergency reserves, potentially starving actual atomic
contexts like interrupt handlers.
[Severity: High]
Does switching to kmalloc() for PAGE_SIZE chunks increase the likelihood of
allocation failures under memory fragmentation?
If memory debugging options like KASAN or SLUB debugging are enabled, the SLUB
allocator inflates the requested PAGE_SIZE with metadata. This pushes the
allocation into a larger size class (e.g., kmalloc-8k), requiring higher-order
page allocations (order-1 or more) from the page allocator. Since the
allocation still uses GFP_ATOMIC, which cannot sleep or wait for direct reclaim,
requesting order-1+ pages is far more likely to fail under memory fragmentation
compared to the original order-0 requests.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630-b4-scsi-v1-0-494fb37ebe7b@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 10:54 [PATCH 0/4] scsi: replace __get_free_pages() with kmalloc() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-06-30 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi: target: file: use kmalloc() to allocate temporary protection buffer Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-01 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-30 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi: proc: use kmalloc() in proc writers Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-06-30 11:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-07-01 10:52 ` John Garry
2026-07-01 13:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-06-30 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi: ipr: use kmalloc() to allocate IPR dump buffer memory Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-06-30 11:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 7:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-07-01 9:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-01 21:03 ` Brian King
2026-06-30 10:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] scsi: sym53c8xx_2: replace __get_free_pages() with kmalloc() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-06-30 11:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630112901.0DD1E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox