From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jay Vadayath" <jay@artiphishell.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: validate device-supplied mode sense lengths in cache_type_store
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:23:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717192313.93D791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717191023.15011-1-jay@artiphishell.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Stack out-of-bounds read and write in `scsi_cdl_enable` due to unvalidated device-supplied mode sense lengths.
- [High] Data race on `struct scsi_disk` bitfields between `cache_type_store` and `sd_revalidate_disk`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] scsi: sd: validate device-supplied mode sense lengths in cache_type_store ---
commit 58b82fd0109d95a6ff61d8f8d2790723466ad640
Author: Jay Vadayath <jay@artiphishell.com>
scsi: sd: validate device-supplied mode sense lengths in cache_type_store
This commit adds bounds checking to cache_type_store() to prevent an
out-of-bounds stack access when parsing device-supplied MODE SENSE lengths.
It explicitly verifies that the combined header and block descriptor
lengths do not exceed the on-stack buffer size before calculating offsets.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 599e75f333343..4234ce314c9d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -268,10 +268,19 @@ cache_type_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> if (scsi_mode_sense(sdp, 0x08, 8, 0, buffer, sizeof(buffer), SD_TIMEOUT,
> sdkp->max_retries, &data, NULL))
> return -EINVAL;
> - len = min_t(size_t, sizeof(buffer), data.length - data.header_length -
> - data.block_descriptor_length);
> - buffer_data = buffer + data.header_length +
> - data.block_descriptor_length;
> +
> + /*
> + * The mode parameter header and block descriptor lengths are
> + * supplied by the device and must not be trusted (e.g. a malicious
> + * USB mass storage device). Reject responses that would place the
> + * caching mode page (of which we touch the first three bytes)
> + * outside of the buffer to avoid an out-of-bounds access below.
> + */
> + offset = data.header_length + data.block_descriptor_length;
> + if (offset + 3 > sizeof(buffer))
> + return -EINVAL;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does modifying bitfields in cache_type_store()
create a data race with other device events?
Earlier in this same function, the code directly modifies sdkp->cache_override:
drivers/scsi/sd.c:cache_type_store() {
...
if (strncmp(buf, temp, sizeof(temp) - 1) == 0) {
buf += sizeof(temp) - 1;
sdkp->cache_override = 1;
...
}
Concurrently, during a device rescan or hotplug event, sd_read_cache_type()
modifies adjacent bitfields in the same struct:
drivers/scsi/sd.c:sd_read_cache_type() {
...
sdkp->DPOFUA = (data.device_specific & 0x10) != 0;
...
}
Since bitfield updates are read-modify-write operations, could a concurrent
sysfs write to cache_type silently corrupt other bitfields like DPOFUA
or lbpme if they aren't protected by a shared lock?
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does a structurally identical out-of-bounds
vulnerability exist in scsi_cdl_enable() in drivers/scsi/scsi.c?
Looking at scsi_cdl_enable(), the same device-supplied lengths are used to
calculate an offset into an on-stack buffer without bounds checking:
drivers/scsi/scsi.c:scsi_cdl_enable() {
...
buf_data = buf + data.header_length + data.block_descriptor_length;
...
buf_data[4] &= ~0x03;
...
}
If a malicious USB device returns a large block_descriptor_length, could
this calculation exceed the stack buffer bounds and lead to memory corruption,
just like the issue fixed here in cache_type_store()?
> + len = min_t(size_t, sizeof(buffer) - offset, data.length - offset);
> + buffer_data = buffer + offset;
> buffer_data[2] &= ~0x05;
> buffer_data[2] |= wce << 2 | rcd;
> sp = buffer_data[0] & 0x80 ? 1 : 0;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717191023.15011-1-jay@artiphishell.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 19:10 [PATCH] scsi: sd: validate device-supplied mode sense lengths in cache_type_store Jay Vadayath
2026-07-17 19:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 19:24 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717192313.93D791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jay@artiphishell.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox