From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Laurence Oberman" <loberman@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scans for all Hyper-V targets
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:51:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723165134.618071F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723163743.1274830-1-loberman@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Kernel panic in fc_eh_timed_out() due to missing NULL check for fc_rport, contradicting the v2 changelog claim.
- [High] Use-After-Free race condition in fc_user_scan_tgt due to unpinned rport pointer.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scans for all Hyper-V targets ---
commit 7a84d34942989f4df1a7195141939c24f221c9ea
Author: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
scsi: storvsc: Support manual scans for all Hyper-V targets
This patch provides a storvsc-specific user_scan callback that uses the
exported scsi_scan_target() interface to allow explicit scanning of targets
without requiring synthetic fc_rports for each target.
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Replace the private, unexported scsi_scan_host_selected() helper with
> the exported scsi_scan_target() interface.
> - Preserve wildcard channel and target scan behavior.
> - Verify that storvsc_eh_timed_out() does not use the FC error-handler
> helpers; the reported missing-rport dereference is not present.
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is the v2 changelog accurate
regarding storvsc_eh_timed_out()?
Looking at storvsc_eh_timed_out() in drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c, it appears
to explicitly route I/O timeouts to the FC transport error handler:
if (scmnd->device->host->transportt == fc_transport_template)
return fc_eh_timed_out(scmnd);
When fc_eh_timed_out() handles this, it extracts the fc_rport pointer:
struct fc_rport *rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(scmd->device));
if (rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_BLOCKED)
Because storvsc targets are created without an intermediate fc_rport parent,
starget_to_rport() returns NULL. Does this mean fc_eh_timed_out() will
immediately dereference a NULL pointer during an I/O timeout?
As a related observation on the FC transport layer scan paths:
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does fc_user_scan_tgt() have a race
condition that could lead to a use-after-free?
In drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c:fc_user_scan_tgt(), the host lock is
dropped before scanning the target:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
scsi_scan_target(&rport->dev, channel, id, lun,
SCSI_SCAN_MANUAL);
If a concurrent FC link down event or port removal triggers
fc_rport_final_delete(), can the rport device be removed and freed before
or during the scsi_scan_target() execution? If so, should a reference be
acquired on rport->dev prior to dropping the lock?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723163743.1274830-1-loberman@redhat.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 16:37 [PATCH v2] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scans for all Hyper-V targets Laurence Oberman
2026-07-23 16:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723165134.618071F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox