Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/57] scsi: scsi_debug: Prepare for enabling lock context analysis
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 23:01:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730230151.9A97A1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02c833ea2e87c7fd3f2a8490f302cfa7383647a4.1785451174.git.bvanassche@acm.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] The `__context_unsafe(conditional locking)` annotation was applied to `resp_write_same` but missed on `resp_read_dt0` and `resp_write_dt0`, which use identical conditional locking logic.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The function `resp_write_same()` leaks a write lock on the data lock (`sip->macc_data_lck`) when `fetch_to_dev_buffer()` fails.
- [High] AB-BA deadlock between `sip->macc_meta_lck` and `sip->macc_data_lck` due to inconsistent lock acquisition order.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v3 02/57] scsi: scsi_debug: Prepare for enabling lock context analysis ---
commit ad9c0fb7632790d874892a1d6261443b39766d7d
Author: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>

scsi: scsi_debug: Prepare for enabling lock context analysis

Suppress lock context analysis for the functions that perform conditional
locking to prevent that the Clang thread-safety analyzer complains about
these functions. Remove incorrect __acquire() and __release() annotations.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index 4a08f0cfae08d..cb6663e24c225 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -5193,6 +5185,7 @@ static int resp_write_scat(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
>  
>  static int resp_write_same(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, u64 lba, u32 num,
>  			   u32 ei_lba, bool unmap, bool ndob)
> +	__context_unsafe(conditional locking)
>  {
>  	struct scsi_device *sdp = scp->device;
>  	struct sdebug_dev_info *devip = (struct sdebug_dev_info *)sdp->hostdata;

[Severity: Medium]
Should drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:resp_read_dt0() and resp_write_dt0() also
get this annotation?

They appear to use the same conditional locking pattern with
meta_data_locked, conditionally acquiring sip->macc_meta_lck.

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:resp_write_same()
leak the sip->macc_data_lck write lock when fetch_to_dev_buffer() fails?

If fetch_to_dev_buffer() returns -1, the code jumps to the out label:

	sdeb_data_write_lock(sip);
	if (ndob) {
		memset(fs1p, 0, lb_size);
		ret = 0;
	} else
		ret = fetch_to_dev_buffer(scp, fs1p, lb_size);

	if (-1 == ret) {
		ret = DID_ERROR << 16;
		goto out;
	}

But the out label only unlocks sip->macc_meta_lck and skips
sdeb_data_write_unlock():

out:
	if (meta_data_locked)
		sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
	return ret;

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but could drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:resp_write_same()
cause a lock ordering deadlock with resp_comp_write()?

In resp_write_same(), the meta lock is acquired first, followed by the
data lock:

	if (sdebug_dev_is_zoned(devip) || scsi_debug_lbp()) {
		sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);
		meta_data_locked = true;
	}
...
	sdeb_data_write_lock(sip);

However, in resp_comp_write(), the acquisition order is reversed:

	sdeb_data_write_lock(sip);
	sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);

Could this lead to a deadlock if a compare and write command and a write same
command are processed concurrently on the same store?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1785451174.git.bvanassche@acm.org?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30 22:44 [PATCH v3 00/57] Enable lock context analysis for the SCSI subsystem Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/57] PCI: Convert to_pci_dev() into an inline function Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/57] scsi: scsi_debug: Prepare for enabling lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/57] scsi: sg: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/57] scsi: st: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/57] scsi: BusLogic: Introduce two local variables Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/57] scsi: BusLogic: Prepare for enabling lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/57] scsi: NCR5380: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/57] scsi: aacraid: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/57] scsi: aic7xxx: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/57] scsi: aha152x: Prepare for enabling " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/57] scsi: aic7xxx: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/57] scsi: aic94xx: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/57] scsi: arcmsr: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/57] scsi: arm: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 15/57] scsi: be2iscsi: Prepare for enabling " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:44 ` [PATCH v3 16/57] scsi: be2iscsi: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 17/57] scsi: cxgbi: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 18/57] scsi: bfa: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 19/57] scsi: bnx2fc: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 20/57] scsi: bnx2i: Introduce a local variable Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 21/57] scsi: bnx2i: Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 22/57] scsi: csiostor: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 23/57] scsi: elx: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 24/57] scsi: esas2r: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 25/57] scsi: fcoe: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 26/57] scsi: fnic: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 27/57] scsi: hisi_sas: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 28/57] scsi: hpsa: Prepare for enabling " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 29/57] scsi: ibmvscsi: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 30/57] scsi: ibmvscsi_tgt: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 31/57] scsi: ipr: Prepare for enabling " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 32/57] scsi: ips: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 33/57] scsi: isci: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 34/57] scsi: libfc: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 35/57] scsi: libiscsi: Prepare for enabling " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 36/57] scsi: libsas: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 37/57] scsi: libsas: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 38/57] scsi: lpfc: Prepare for enabling " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 39/57] scsi: megaraid_sas: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 40/57] scsi: megaraid: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 41/57] scsi: mpt3sas: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 42/57] scsi: mvsas: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 43/57] scsi: pcmcia: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 44/57] scsi: pm8001: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 45/57] scsi: qedf: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 46/57] scsi: qedi: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 47/57] scsi: qla1280: Prepare for enabling " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 48/57] scsi: qla2xxx: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 49/57] scsi: qla4xxx: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 50/57] scsi: ufs: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 51/57] scsi: iSCSI transport: Prepare for enabling " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 52/57] scsi: smartpqi: Enable " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 53/57] scsi: snic: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 54/57] scsi: sym53c8xx_2: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 55/57] scsi: core: Pass the SCSI host pointer directly Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 56/57] scsi: core: Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 57/57] scsi: core: Protect host state changes with the host lock Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 23:32   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260730230151.9A97A1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox