linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ilya Khomyakov" <khomyakovilya@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: make SAS port PHY masks 64-bit safe
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:39:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804143907.9B3AA1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804140004.4004-1-khomyakovilya@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incorrect bit iteration over a `u64` variable using `for_each_set_bit` in `mpi3mr_update_mr_sas_port`.
- [High] Out-of-bounds heap write in `mpi3mr_refresh_sas_ports` when a controller firmware reports more than 64 unique PHY connections.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: make SAS port PHY masks 64-bit safe ---
commit f7b3b6c83f03cd4dace1e13e5700d80724e506b0
Author: Ilya Khomyakov <khomyakovilya@gmail.com>

    scsi: mpi3mr: make SAS port PHY masks 64-bit safe
    
    This patch fixes 64-bit PHY-mask handling in the Broadcom MPI3 Storage
    Controller driver under drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
> index 240f67a8e2e3b..d6492dddf7352 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1765,7 +1805,7 @@ mpi3mr_refresh_sas_ports(struct mpi3mr_ioc *mrioc)
>  		port_idx = host_port_count;
>  		h_port[port_idx].sas_address = le64_to_cpu(sasinf->sas_address);
>  		h_port[port_idx].handle = attached_handle;
> -		h_port[port_idx].phy_mask = (1 << i);
> +		h_port[port_idx].phy_mask = mpi3mr_sas_phy_bit(i);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can the h_port array overflow
when iterating over the PHYs in mpi3mr_refresh_sas_ports()?

The array is allocated earlier in the function with a fixed size of 64:

	h_port = kzalloc_objs(struct host_port, 64);

Since the loop iterates up to mrioc->sas_hba.num_phys times (which is an
8-bit integer allowing up to 255), and host_port_count is incremented for
each unique attached handle without bounds checking, will this write out of
bounds if the firmware reports more than 64 unique PHY connections?

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but since we are making PHY masks 64-bit
safe, is the bit iteration over the u64 mask in mpi3mr_update_mr_sas_port()
working correctly on 32-bit big-endian architectures?

mpi3mr_update_mr_sas_port() uses for_each_set_bit with a cast to ulong *:

	u64 phys_to_be_added, phys_to_be_removed;
	...
	for_each_set_bit(i, (ulong *) &phys_to_be_added, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) {
		mr_sas_phy = &mrioc->sas_hba.phy[i];

By casting a local u64 pointer to unsigned long * on 32-bit big-endian
systems, won't the bit halves be swapped? This could result in out-of-bounds
array accesses on mrioc->sas_hba.phy[i] and incorrect topology changes since
bits 0-31 become 32-63 and vice versa.

>  		h_port[port_idx].iounit_port_id = sas_io_unit_pg0->phy_data[i].io_unit_port;
>  		h_port[port_idx].lowest_phy = sasinf->phy_num;
>  		h_port[port_idx].used = 0;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804140004.4004-1-khomyakovilya@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 14:00 [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: make SAS port PHY masks 64-bit safe Ilya Khomyakov
2026-08-04 14:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-04 14:28 Ilya Khomyakov
2026-08-04 15:29 ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260804143907.9B3AA1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=khomyakovilya@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).