Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jesse Taube" <jtaubepe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] nvme-multipath: numa support for marginal paths
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:29:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812182939.C1D171F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812181300.3712426-4-jtaubepe@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Double evaluation of volatile controller state creates a TOCTOU race that can select a sub-optimal marginal path over a better non-marginal path.
- [Medium] The round-robin multipath I/O policy (`nvme_round_robin_path`) was not updated to handle marginal paths, bypassing the new `NVME_CTRL_MARGINAL` priority logic.
- [Low] The comment explaining the fallback path selection has inverted logic.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 03/13] nvme-multipath: numa support for marginal paths ---
commit 820a8648fdbfc8327ddaf233abd513210c265d17
Author: Jesse Taube <jtaubepe@redhat.com>

nvme-multipath: numa support for marginal paths

This patch introduces the NVME_CTRL_MARGINAL flag to handle FPIN LI
(link integrity) messages indicating hardware errors. The multipath
scheduler is updated to direct I/O away from affected marginal ports by
skipping them when non-marginal optimized paths are available.

> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> index 9b9a657fa330f..02936c580a373 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -323,15 +357,19 @@ static struct nvme_ns *__nvme_find_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head, int node)
>  
>  		switch (ns->ana_state) {
>  		case NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED:
> -			if (distance < found_distance) {
> +			if (is_best_distance(found_is_marginal, nvme_ctrl_is_marginal(ns->ctrl),
> +					     found_distance, distance)) {
>  				found_distance = distance;
>  				found = ns;
> +				found_is_marginal = nvme_ctrl_is_marginal(ns->ctrl);
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Severity: Medium]
Could this double evaluation of nvme_ctrl_is_marginal() cause a race
condition?

nvme_ctrl_is_marginal() uses test_bit(), which performs a volatile memory
read. If the controller's marginal state transitions from false to true between
these two reads, a previously found non-marginal path will be incorrectly
replaced by this new path, which is then subsequently recorded as marginal.

Would it be better to read the marginal state into a local variable once per
iteration?

>  			}
>  			break;
>  		case NVME_ANA_NONOPTIMIZED:
> -			if (distance < fallback_distance) {
> +			if (is_best_distance(fallback_is_marginal, nvme_ctrl_is_marginal(ns->ctrl),
> +					     fallback_distance, distance)) {
>  				fallback_distance = distance;
>  				fallback = ns;
> +				fallback_is_marginal = nvme_ctrl_is_marginal(ns->ctrl);
                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Severity: Medium]
Does this have the same race condition as the NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED case above?

Using a local variable for the marginal state might prevent inconsistencies
if the bit changes between the two checks.

>  			}
>  			break;
>  		default:

[ ... ]

> @@ -339,6 +377,14 @@ static struct nvme_ns *__nvme_find_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head, int node)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Use non-optimized path only if it is not marginal
> +	 * and no optimized path is marginal.
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Severity: Low]
Is the logic in this comment inverted?

The code correctly falls back to a non-marginal path only when the optimized
path is marginal (found_is_marginal && !fallback_is_marginal). However, the
comment incorrectly states it falls back if "no optimized path is marginal",
which contradicts the implemented boolean logic.

> +	 */
> +	if (found_is_marginal && !fallback_is_marginal)
> +		found = fallback;
> +
> +	/* No optimized path found, use the fallback */
>  	if (!found)
>  		found = fallback;
>  	if (found)

[ ... ]

> @@ -444,7 +490,8 @@ static struct nvme_ns *nvme_queue_depth_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>  static inline bool nvme_path_is_optimized(struct nvme_ns *ns)
>  {
>  	return nvme_ctrl_state(ns->ctrl) == NVME_CTRL_LIVE &&
> -		ns->ana_state == NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED;
> +		ns->ana_state == NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED &&
> +		!nvme_ctrl_is_marginal(ns->ctrl);
>  }

[Severity: Medium]
Since marginal paths are now supported and skipped in the NUMA and queue depth
policies, does nvme_round_robin_path() also need to be updated?

If a user configures iopolicy=round-robin, the multipath scheduler seems to
actively route I/O to marginal paths without checking the state:

drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c:nvme_round_robin_path() {
    ...
		if (ns->ana_state == NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED) {
			found = ns;
			goto out;
		}
    ...
}

Could this risk I/O timeouts and dropped packets on unreliable hardware links
by bypassing the new NVME_CTRL_MARGINAL priority logic?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812181300.3712426-1-jtaubepe@redhat.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 18:12 [PATCH 00/13] nvme-fc: FPIN link integrity handling Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 01/13] fc_els: use 'union fc_tlv_desc' Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 02/13] nvme: add NVME_CTRL_MARGINAL flag Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 03/13] nvme-multipath: numa support for marginal paths Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:29   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 04/13] nvme-multipath: queue-depth " Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 05/13] nvme-multipath: round-robin " Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 06/13] nvme: sysfs: emit the marginal path state in show_state() Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 07/13] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Add set_rport_marginal to fc_function_template Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 08/13] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: user support for clearing NVME_CTRL_MARGINAL Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 09/13] nvme-fc: add nvme_fc_set_remoteport_fpin() Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 10/13] scsi: qla2xxx: enable FPIN notification for NVMe Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 19:38     ` Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 11/13] scsi: lpfc: " Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 12/13] nvme: fcloop: Add set_rport_marginal to sysfs Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:34   ` Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:13 ` [PATCH 13/13] docs: nvme-multipath: Add FC-NVMe marginal state Jesse Taube
2026-08-12 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:46   ` Randy Dunlap
2026-08-12 18:50     ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260812182939.C1D171F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=jtaubepe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox