From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yehyeong Lee" <yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: check that the tag map is still there in scsi_host_find_tag()
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:02:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814020256.5335A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814010423.205976-1-yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The lockless checks for `shost->tag_set.tags` and `shost->tag_set.tags[hwq]` introduce a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition that fails to safely resolve the Use-After-Free and NULL pointer dereference vulnerabilities.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] scsi: check that the tag map is still there in scsi_host_find_tag() ---
commit 090ebf7d7f01fec40907d4c4480b8d9725dc44b2
Author: Yehyeong Lee <yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
scsi: check that the tag map is still there in scsi_host_find_tag()
This commit addresses a NULL pointer dereference in scsi_host_find_tag()
that occurs when a driver looks up a tag while the host is being removed.
It attempts to fix this by explicitly checking if shost->tag_set.tags and
shost->tag_set.tags[hwq] are non-NULL before dereferencing them.
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_tcq.h b/include/scsi/scsi_tcq.h
> index ea7848e74d257..d62bae05d4e7d 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_tcq.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_tcq.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ static inline struct scsi_cmnd *scsi_host_find_tag(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> return NULL;
>
> hwq = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(tag);
> - if (hwq < shost->tag_set.nr_hw_queues) {
> + if (hwq < shost->tag_set.nr_hw_queues && shost->tag_set.tags &&
> + shost->tag_set.tags[hwq]) {
> req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(shost->tag_set.tags[hwq],
> blk_mq_unique_tag_to_tag(tag));
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this lockless check leave a
time-of-check to time-of-use race condition unresolved?
The commit message notes that blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() tests the array
before using it, but that iterator operates under an srcu_read_lock(). Here
in scsi_host_find_tag(), there is no synchronization.
Could a thread evaluate shost->tag_set.tags and shost->tag_set.tags[hwq] as
non-NULL, get preempted while blk_mq_free_tag_set() clears and frees the tags,
and then resume to dereference freed memory in blk_mq_tag_to_rq()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814010423.205976-1-yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 1:04 [PATCH] scsi: check that the tag map is still there in scsi_host_find_tag() Yehyeong Lee
2026-08-14 2:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814020256.5335A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox