From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Triet Hoang" <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: Handle SAS port and rphy allocation failures
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:36:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817053653.2B7CB1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817052619.810762-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Target device reference and state leak on newly added error paths.
- [High] Corruption of SAS PHY state on rphy allocation failure.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: Handle SAS port and rphy allocation failures ---
commit df830714a909590a741f4ae3350492bababc3051
Author: Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
scsi: mpi3mr: Handle SAS port and rphy allocation failures
This commit adds checks for the return values of sas_port_alloc_num(),
sas_port_add(), sas_end_device_alloc(), and sas_expander_alloc(), adding
cleanup and failure paths to prevent NULL pointer dereferences.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
> index 240f67a8e2e3b..2fbfd178c5398 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
> @@ -1428,9 +1428,17 @@ static struct mpi3mr_sas_port *mpi3mr_sas_port_add(struct mpi3mr_ioc *mrioc,
> }
>
> port = sas_port_alloc_num(mr_sas_node->parent_dev);
> + if (!port) {
> + ioc_err(mrioc, "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
> + __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> + goto out_fail;
[Severity: High]
Does this error path leak the tgtdev reference and leave its state corrupted?
Earlier in the function, if the device type is SAS_END_DEVICE, tgtdev is
acquired via mpi3mr_get_tgtdev_by_addr() and its pend_sas_rphy_add flag
is set to 1:
if (mr_sas_port->remote_identify.device_type == SAS_END_DEVICE) {
tgtdev = mpi3mr_get_tgtdev_by_addr(mrioc, ...);
...
tgtdev->dev_spec.sas_sata_inf.pend_sas_rphy_add = 1;
}
The success path correctly resets this state and drops the reference via
mpi3mr_tgtdev_put(tgtdev). However, the newly added error paths jumping
to out_fail bypass this cleanup, which leaves the reference leaked and the
pend_sas_rphy_add state inconsistent.
> + }
> +
> if ((sas_port_add(port))) {
> ioc_err(mrioc, "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
> __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> + sas_port_free(port);
> + port = NULL;
> goto out_fail;
> }
>
[ ... ]
> @@ -1455,6 +1463,19 @@ static struct mpi3mr_sas_port *mpi3mr_sas_port_add(struct mpi3mr_ioc *mrioc,
> rphy = sas_expander_alloc(port,
> mr_sas_port->remote_identify.device_type);
> }
> +
> + if (!rphy) {
> + ioc_err(mrioc, "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
> + __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> + list_for_each_entry(mr_sas_phy, &mr_sas_port->phy_list, port_siblings) {
> + mr_sas_phy->phy_belongs_to_port = 0;
> + mr_sas_phy->hba_port = NULL;
[Severity: High]
Does clearing hba_port here corrupt the SAS PHY topological state?
The hba_port field appears to be persistently assigned to underlying PHYs
during discovery. It is required and used earlier in this function to match
phys to ports:
for (i = 0; i < mr_sas_node->num_phys; i++) {
if ((mr_sas_node->phy[i].remote_identify.sas_address !=
mr_sas_port->remote_identify.sas_address) ||
(mr_sas_node->phy[i].hba_port != hba_port))
continue;
If this error cleanup loop unconditionally sets hba_port to NULL, won't it
permanently prevent these PHYs from being matched or added to an HBA port in
future discovery cycles?
> + sas_port_delete_phy(port, mr_sas_phy->phy);
> + }
> + sas_port_delete(port);
> + goto out_fail;
[Severity: High]
Similar to the sas_port_alloc_num() failure above, jumping to out_fail here
also bypasses the cleanup of the tgtdev reference and pend_sas_rphy_add.
> + }
> +
> rphy->identify = mr_sas_port->remote_identify;
>
> if (mrioc->current_event)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817052619.810762-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 5:26 [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: Handle SAS port and rphy allocation failures Triet Hoang
2026-08-17 5:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817053653.2B7CB1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox