From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chandrakanth Patil" <chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] mpi3mr: zero out diagnostic buffer status memory
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:21:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818182113.87AB51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818231426.58105-16-chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] An integer overflow in the bounds check of `mpi3mr_bsg_upload_hdb` allows a malicious user to bypass the check and read arbitrary kernel memory.
--
--- Patch [15]: [PATCH 15/17] mpi3mr: zero out diagnostic buffer status memory ---
commit 76872b40f16cd1ab1c93f0a03cc6bd1fb6b3db94
Author: Chandrakanth Patil <chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com>
mpi3mr: zero out diagnostic buffer status memory
Memory allocated for the BSG diagnostic buffer status is not zero'd
before it is copied back to user space. Several fields in this
structure are reserved and never written by the driver. Use kzalloc
instead of kmalloc to zero out the allocated memory.
Fixes: 78b506984ebe ("scsi: mpi3mr: Add ioctl support for HDB")
Signed-off-by: Chandrakanth Patil <chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c
> index f5b48c95cf055..0cdcb8d236d37 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static long mpi3mr_bsg_query_hdb(struct mpi3mr_ioc *mrioc,
>
> length = (sizeof(*hbd_status) + ((MPI3MR_MAX_NUM_HDB - 1) *
> sizeof(*hbd_status_entry)));
> - hbd_status = kmalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL);
> + hbd_status = kzalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!hbd_status)
> return -ENOMEM;
> hbd_status_entry = &hbd_status->entry[0];
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing this file I noticed a
potential integer overflow in mpi3mr_bsg_upload_hdb():
drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:mpi3mr_bsg_upload_hdb() {
...
if ((upload_hdb.start_offset + upload_hdb.length) > diag_buffer->size) {
dprint_bsg_err(mrioc,
"%s: invalid start offset %d, length %d for type %d\n",
__func__, upload_hdb.start_offset, upload_hdb.length,
upload_hdb.buf_type);
return -EINVAL;
}
...
}
Can upload_hdb.start_offset and upload_hdb.length wrap around during addition?
Since they are 32-bit unsigned integers controlled by user space via the BSG
interface, a large start_offset (e.g. 0xFFFFFFF0) and a small length
(e.g. 0x20) could wrap to a sum that passes the bounds check against
diag_buffer->size.
Would this allow a malicious user to bypass the check and read arbitrary kernel
memory when the subsequent copy occurs?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818231426.58105-1-chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com?part=15
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 23:14 [PATCH 0/17] mpi3mr: fix out-of-bounds accesses and reference leaks Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 01/17] mpi3mr: Fix buffer overflow in BSG passthrough request copy Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 02/17] mpi3mr: Fix out-of-bounds read when copying BSG MPI requests Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 03/17] mpi3mr: Fix I/O block counter leak on admin request post failure Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 04/17] mpi3mr: Fix target device reference leak in BSG task management Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 05/17] mpi3mr: Fix buffer overflow when caching log data Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 06/17] mpi3mr: Fix out-of-bounds reply frame access Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 07/17] mpi3mr: Fix out-of-bounds sense buffer access Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 08/17] mpi3mr: Fix out-of-bounds bitmap access during device removal Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 09/17] mpi3mr: Fix target device reference leak in device removal handshake Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 10/17] mpi3mr: Fix out-of-bounds read in SAS topology change events Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 11/17] mpi3mr: Fix out-of-bounds read of event data Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 12/17] mpi3mr: Fix out-of-bounds phy array access on link change Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 13/17] mpi3mr: Fix buffer overflow in the BSG target device map Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 14/17] mpi3mr: Fix out-of-bounds read in PCIe topology change events Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 15/17] mpi3mr: zero out diagnostic buffer status memory Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:21 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 16/17] mpi3mr: Fix use-after-free of the firmware event workqueue Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 17/17] mpi3mr: Fix NULL pointer dereference on PCI error recovery Chandrakanth Patil
2026-08-18 18:32 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818182113.87AB51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox