Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Eshaan Deshmukh" <eshaan2031@icloud.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] scsi: libsas: Handle errors in sas_ex_discover_expander()
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 03:38:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819033851.4746A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819032321.493746-4-eshaan2031@icloud.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unchecked return value from `sas_expander_alloc()` causes a fatal out-of-bounds write/kernel panic when accessing `edev->level`.
- [High] Ignoring the return value of `sas_rphy_add(rphy)` leads to driver core crashes and invalid subsystem state.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 3/3] scsi: libsas: Handle errors in  sas_ex_discover_expander() ---
(Note: Due to system recitation restrictions, this review uses a free-form summary format instead of inline patch quoting.)

commit 44af8b2a020232c7d2be451e3b31502443d8fc4d
Author: Eshaan Deshmukh <eshaan2031@icloud.com>

scsi: libsas: Handle errors in sas_ex_discover_expander()

This commit improves error handling in sas_ex_discover_expander() by checking
the return values of sas_port_alloc() and sas_port_add(). If either function
fails, it performs proper cleanup and returns NULL.

In drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c:sas_ex_discover_expander()

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code risk a panic under memory
pressure?

The function calls sas_expander_alloc() to allocate rphy, but does not
check if the return value is NULL. Later, it calls
rphy_to_expander_device(rphy) which uses container_of() and subtracts the
offset of rphy. If rphy is NULL, edev becomes a negative pointer. The
subsequent write to edev->level = parent_ex->level + 1 would then
unconditionally panic the kernel.

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does ignoring the return
value of sas_rphy_add() lead to a crash during error recovery?

The code calls sas_rphy_add(rphy) without checking its return value. If
sas_rphy_add() fails, the internal device_add() fails, meaning the device
was never actually added to the system. 

If the subsequent call to sas_discover_expander(child) also fails, the
error handling path calls sas_rphy_delete(rphy). This attempts to call
device_del() on a device that was never successfully added, which will
dereference uninitialized fields and crash the driver core.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260819032321.493746-1-eshaan2031@icloud.com?part=3

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-19  3:23 [PATCH v4 0/3] Fix control flow in sas_ex_add_parent_port() Eshaan Deshmukh
2026-08-19  3:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: libsas: Handle errors " Eshaan Deshmukh
2026-08-19  3:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19  3:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: libsas: Handle errors in sas_set_ex_phy() Eshaan Deshmukh
2026-08-19  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19  3:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] scsi: libsas: Handle errors in sas_ex_discover_expander() Eshaan Deshmukh
2026-08-19  3:38   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260819033851.4746A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=eshaan2031@icloud.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox