Re: [PATCH v1 07/11] blk-crypto: move bio_crypt_dun_increment() to the public header

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Missing EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for bio_crypt_dun_increment causes module build failures.
--

commit a07e0dacccb884a51c1f14000f1404eb1f5c2cf7
Author: linlzhan <linlin.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
blk-crypto: move bio_crypt_dun_increment() to the public header

This commit moves the declaration of bio_crypt_dun_increment() from the
internal block header to the public blk-crypto.h header. This allows drivers
managing inline-encrypted I/O directly to advance the data unit number.

> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-crypto.h b/include/linux/blk-crypto.h
> index 33ae52b77522b..c9f436b6b2ef4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-crypto.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-crypto.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,9 @@ bool bio_crypt_dun_is_contiguous(const struct bio_crypt_ctx *bc,
>  				 unsigned int bytes,
>  				 const u64 next_dun[BLK_CRYPTO_DUN_ARRAY_SIZE]);
>  
> +void bio_crypt_dun_increment(u64 dun[BLK_CRYPTO_DUN_ARRAY_SIZE],
> +			     unsigned int inc);
> +

[Severity: Low]
Does the missing EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() for this function cause module build
failures?

Since this function is now exposed for external drivers to use, if a driver
using it is configured as a loadable module, it seems the kernel build will
fail at the modpost step with an undefined symbol error.

Should an EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_crypt_dun_increment) be added alongside its
implementation in block/blk-crypto.c so that modules can successfully link
against it?

>  int blk_crypto_init_key(struct blk_crypto_key *blk_key,
>  			const u8 *key_bytes, size_t key_size,
>  			enum blk_crypto_key_type key_type,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260827160806.1295313-1-linlin.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com?part=7