From: Liang Haowen <nbg2974@gmail.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/1] leds: asus-aura-scsi: Add ASUS Aura RGB LED driver for ROG NVMe enclosures
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 20:45:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202609042045.ReplyLee.lhw@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903161357.GX2133376@google.com>
On Thu, 3 Sep 2026, Lee Jones wrote:
> Please review, explain or fix the Sashiko review(s).
Fixed, fixed, fixed, false positive, false positive:
- [High] empty work run writing flash: real. The work now snapshots
the dirty mask up front and returns before issuing any SCSI command
when nothing is pending.
- [Medium] name collision between enclosures: real. With the static
name the LED core would register a second enclosure's LEDs under
renamed nodes (led0_1) rather than fail, which is still the wrong
device identity. Names now include the sdev's H:C:T:L, which is
unique per enclosure.
- [Medium] colour write vs dirty bit ordering: real on weakly ordered
architectures. A per-zone spinlock now covers the colour cache and
the mask on both sides.
- [Low] blk_rq_map_kern() argument count: false positive. The current
signature is (rq, buf, len, gfp); drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c calls it
exactly this way from scsi_execute_cmd().
- [Low] kzalloc_obj(): false positive. It is in include/linux/slab.h
since v7.0.
v3 with the three fixes follows. One question in its cover letter:
whether deferring the Kconfig/Makefile/MAINTAINERS wiring to the
agreed SCSI split is acceptable for the RFC stage.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 14:26 [PATCH RFC 0/1] leds: add ASUS Aura SCSI driver for ROG NVMe enclosures Liang Haowen
2026-09-01 14:34 ` [PATCH RFC 1/1] " Liang Haowen
2026-09-01 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 12:00 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/1] leds: asus-aura-scsi: Add ASUS Aura RGB LED " Liang Haowen
2026-09-03 12:00 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/1] " Liang Haowen
2026-09-03 12:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:13 ` Lee Jones
2026-09-04 12:30 ` [PATCH RFC v3 0/1] " Liang Haowen
2026-09-04 12:30 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/1] " Liang Haowen
2026-09-04 13:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 12:45 ` Liang Haowen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202609042045.ReplyLee.lhw@gmail.com \
--to=nbg2974@gmail.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox