From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nigel Kirkland" <nkirkland2304@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/14] lpfc: Put iocbq on phba->txq when ELS WQ is full or ELS SGL unavailable
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 22:20:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917222019.4E22A1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917222015.61053-12-nkirkland2304@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] scsi: lpfc: txq list churning in lpfc_drain_txq due to missing SLI_IOCB_RET_IOCB flag
--
commit 8b96ef178c664b569b564d0486b1112a8fe88e10
Author: Nigel Kirkland <nkirkland2304@gmail.com>
lpfc: Put iocbq on phba->txq when ELS WQ is full or ELS SGL unavailable
This commit adds logic to queue ELS/CT commands to the head or tail of the
txq for retry when the ELS WQ is full or SGLs are unavailable. It updates
lpfc_drain_txq to handle these retry scenarios.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -10819,12 +10866,19 @@ __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb_s4(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t ring_number,
> if (!sglq) {
> if (!(flag & SLI_IOCB_RET_IOCB)) {
> __lpfc_sli_ringtx_put(phba,
> pring,
> - piocb);
> + piocb, false);
> return IOCB_SUCCESS;
> } else {
> return IOCB_BUSY;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
If lpfc_drain_txq() passes 0 for the flag, won't it trigger this block?
When SLI_IOCB_RET_IOCB is omitted, this path places the IOCB at the tail of
the txq and returns IOCB_SUCCESS. This defeats the newly added back-off
mechanism in lpfc_drain_txq() which relies on receiving an IOCB_BUSY status
to execute its retry logic and push the failing IOCB to the head.
[ ... ]
> @@ -21301,12 +21355,15 @@ lpfc_drain_txq(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
> }
> txq_cnt--;
>
> + /* Capture the return values that indicate an error during IO
> + * submit and cannot be retried. Prefix message 2822.
> + */
> ret = __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(phba, pring->ringno, piocbq, 0);
[Severity: Medium]
Does this missing flag cause txq list churning during resource exhaustion?
Because the flag is passed as 0 here (instead of SLI_IOCB_RET_IOCB), the
underlying __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb() call will not return IOCB_BUSY when SGL
resources are exhausted. Since IOCB_SUCCESS is returned instead, the loop
below won't break early and will continuously pop and push items back to the
tail of the txq.
> -
> - if (ret && ret != IOCB_BUSY) {
> + if (ret && ret != IOCB_BUSY && ret != IOCB_FAILED_PUT) {
> fail_msg = " - Cannot send IO ";
> piocbq->cmd_flag &= ~LPFC_DRIVER_ABORTED;
> }
> +
> if (fail_msg) {
> piocbq->cmd_flag |= LPFC_DRIVER_ABORTED;
> /* Failed means we can't issue and need to cancel */
> @@ -21319,9 +21376,35 @@ lpfc_drain_txq(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
> list_add_tail(&piocbq->list, &completions);
> fail_msg = NULL;
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags);
> - if (txq_cnt == 0 || ret == IOCB_BUSY)
> +
> + if (txq_cnt == 0 || ret == IOCB_BUSY ||
> + ret == IOCB_FAILED_PUT) {
> + /* IOCB_FAILED_PUT is unique to SLI4 and means SGL/XRI
> + * resources are allocated. For this case, set the
> + * in retry flag. For SLI3 and 4, push the IO to the
> + * txq for retry.
> + */
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917222015.61053-1-nkirkland2304@gmail.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 22:20 [PATCH v4 00/14] Update lpfc to revision 15.0.0.1 Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] lpfc: Fix use-after-free in lpfc_cmpl_ct_cmd_vmid Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] lpfc: Early return out of lpfc_els_abort when HBA_SETUP flag is not set Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] lpfc: Fix kernel oops when unmapping scsi dma buffers for an aborted cmd Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] lpfc: Check fc4_xpt_flags before decrementing ndlp kref on FDISC error Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] lpfc: Add handling for when PLOGI or PRLI is dropped during link failure Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] lpfc: Fix ndlp use-after-free during repeated RSCN and rediscovery sequence Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] lpfc: Rework I/O flush ordering when unloading driver Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] lpfc: Improve PLOGI retry handling for large SAN configurations Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] lpfc: Send inhibited ABORT_WQE when PLOGI CQE SEQUENCE_TMO is received Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] lpfc: Remove slowpath cqe process limiter in slow ring event handler Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] lpfc: Put iocbq on phba->txq when ELS WQ is full or ELS SGL unavailable Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] lpfc: Update ELS ACC logging for diagnostic troubleshooting Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] lpfc: Refactor calls on fc_disctmo to lpfc_set_disctmo in RSCN handler Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-17 22:20 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] lpfc: Update lpfc version to 15.0.0.1 Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-19 7:45 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] Update lpfc to revision 15.0.0.1 Nigel Kirkland
2026-09-28 17:13 ` Nigel Kirkland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917222019.4E22A1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nkirkland2304@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox