Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Runyu Xiao" <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] fs: configfs: add helpers for opening non-configfs paths
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:38:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260926093820.B93E51F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926092148.128937-2-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] fs: configfs: configfs_file_open() ignores O_NOFOLLOW flag
--

commit 76452a998ac4b5def9cd38ece0706188bd3e3ed4
Author: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>

fs: configfs: add helpers for opening non-configfs paths

This commit adds configfs_open_root() and configfs_file_open() to allow
configfs store callbacks to open non-configfs paths without re-entering
configfs and acquiring the same non-recursive semaphore again.

> diff --git a/fs/configfs/mount.c b/fs/configfs/mount.c
> --- a/fs/configfs/mount.c
> +++ b/fs/configfs/mount.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -118,6 +119,58 @@ static struct file_system_type configfs_fs_type = {

[ ... ]

> +struct file *configfs_file_open(const char *filename, int flags, umode_t mode)
> +{
> +	struct file *file;
> +	struct path path;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kern_path(filename, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &path);

[Severity: Medium]
Does hardcoding LOOKUP_FOLLOW here bypass the caller's O_NOFOLLOW intent if
it is provided in the flags?

If a caller invokes configfs_file_open() with flags containing O_NOFOLLOW
on a symlink, kern_path() will unconditionally resolve the symlink. The
resolved target is then passed to file_open_root() via configfs_open_root().
Because file_open_root() only checks if the resolved target itself is a
symlink, this successfully bypasses the O_NOFOLLOW intent, silently
traversing the symlink instead of failing.

> +	if (ret)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	file = configfs_open_root(&path, "", flags, mode);
> +	path_put(&path);
> +	return file;
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260926092148.128937-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-26  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26  9:21 [PATCH v6 0/4] nvmet: avoid recursive configfs open Runyu Xiao
2026-09-26  9:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] fs: configfs: add helpers for opening non-configfs paths Runyu Xiao
2026-09-26  9:38   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-26  9:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] nvmet: avoid recursive configfs open for file-backed namespaces Runyu Xiao
2026-09-26  9:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] nvmet: avoid recursive configfs open for passthru Runyu Xiao
2026-09-28 15:50   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-26  9:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] scsi: target: pin db_root for metadata writes Runyu Xiao
2026-09-26  9:37   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260926093820.B93E51F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox