From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C28337C112; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 20:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791233356; cv=none; b=OX1URAVHlTpQgfM2HSGV+5YJ545GAV+Zwn0ugEnG5CBuUjCElqF/lbTvSqin+sH0n4TVibpbVEmtWJFbSTbv3jKhMPQvxzBwpI1MPKIimkUNCtZ0A2x0h5ATaMnvMufsH1Mf8FtSYjgMBT4081XTSdcv+NgVGkEykLYqD0ODx0U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791233356; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b5eO6cu/x2LURXsfvcknrPjDXFK/Ia5yCd9i79Wafws=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pZ/SObVPMW89QDR2fh3kfU6NtYd0O5GoLaNZBfN69nhRmBLoC/mRyfM95vSAaxal6KcoksslC5if2mxcYzKRxE4I9wM8IlUoLrKNoSxSNYpYoTI9E8XJUm7vMQfbMyGFNMhjkZqA8Nb59H9GG8GRVEAcywW8H5LvviQm2NSa1ZM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TZ9d8orD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TZ9d8orD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1791233354; x=1822769354; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=b5eO6cu/x2LURXsfvcknrPjDXFK/Ia5yCd9i79Wafws=; b=TZ9d8orD1lfmLxUkabt//8sE1lYoY9A6ZSz8GNTVwP92P4XfeNl49hTl ttVedSTbIHF0Wjs4t1P/tqUm+W8MjeRJ1Drv4Z4LjWHXGL/+obn7u8pur Fg3yS/JfmcbqrhqZ8vYiY8zKL4WEyOwQ4753566jY/IxMhzpAs85o6vLt TpL/ycy+s+jcTQK0MAMtzNCjjfBEOJKg13SerRphACvex+nwvocfAvVHp ppHRA+RAkDc9LJ9OJpOw2VqoXabefKCXMfu3Lg4RPPPKBRdN21CGoqoCV bqT0Uo9avXGF7ZuxZWBNzjMOe/ZJup4tTOHRSs0qnCdmwsalXtMH8BXkQ g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0aoYTR4nQAGtBEfWRKc1iA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 89lCgMUWSVODcLj2hk2N5Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11926"; a="92025882" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,142,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="92025882" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Oct 2026 13:49:13 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ePiNLwHJTSeZCJ/q+1n7UA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: JbVKTsJhSvOTL8cjoVt8Hw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,142,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="274712953" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 0caa9d2d175c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2026 13:49:12 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 0caa9d2d175c with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xDpcT-000000000pg-0eow; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:49:09 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 04:48:47 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Damien Le Moal , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] scsi: sd_zbc: define storage element management operations Message-ID: <202610060413.UQ1Jyndv-lkp@intel.com> References: <20261005094632.580753-8-dlemoal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261005094632.580753-8-dlemoal@kernel.org> Hi Damien, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on axboe/for-next] [also build test ERROR on next-20261005] [cannot apply to mkp-scsi/for-next jejb-scsi/for-next linus/master v7.3-rc6] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Damien-Le-Moal/block-fail-reads-to-offline-zones-early/20261005-184626 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261005094632.580753-8-dlemoal%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 7/7] scsi: sd_zbc: define storage element management operations config: sparc-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261006/202610060413.UQ1Jyndv-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261006/202610060413.UQ1Jyndv-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202610060413.UQ1Jyndv-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/scsi/sd.c:3940:35: error: lvalue required as unary '&' operand 3940 | .se_ops = &sd_zbc_se_ops, | ^ vim +3940 drivers/scsi/sd.c 3926 3927 static const struct block_device_operations sd_fops = { 3928 .owner = THIS_MODULE, 3929 .open = sd_open, 3930 .release = sd_release, 3931 .ioctl = sd_ioctl, 3932 .getgeo = sd_getgeo, 3933 .compat_ioctl = blkdev_compat_ptr_ioctl, 3934 .check_events = sd_check_events, 3935 .unlock_native_capacity = sd_unlock_native_capacity, 3936 .report_zones = sd_zbc_report_zones, 3937 .get_unique_id = sd_get_unique_id, 3938 .free_disk = scsi_disk_free_disk, 3939 .pr_ops = &sd_pr_ops, > 3940 .se_ops = &sd_zbc_se_ops, 3941 }; 3942 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki