From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: dgilbert@interlog.com,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] scsi: ufs: Implement polling support
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:39:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <209216ac-878a-3e96-5e8e-eaa92fad7f35@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b921b85e-1685-da71-2ee7-806d8e75ce9d@interlog.com>
On 11/9/21 17:36, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 2021-11-09 7:44 p.m., Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> The time spent in io_schedule() is significant when submitting direct
>> I/O to a UFS device. Hence this patch that implements polling support.
>> User space software can enable polling by passing the RWF_HIPRI flag to
>> the preadv2() system call or the IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL flag to the
>> io_uring interface.
>
> There have been some changes recently (i.e. in linux-stable now),
> "HIPRI" seems to be on the out, replaced by "POLLED". [I'm using
> poll_lld in my sg rewrite to refer to this type of polling, as "poll"
> is an overloaded term in the kernel].
>
> REQ_HIPRI has become REQ_POLLED and blk_poll() is now bio_poll().
> That said RWF_HIPRI is still in fs.h and there is no RWF_POLLED (yet).
Hi Doug,
My reference to RWF_HIPRI in the patch description refers to the flag
defined in the uapi headers. As far as I know that flag is still there:
$ PAGER= git grep define.RWF_HIPRI include/uapi
include/uapi/linux/fs.h:#define RWF_HIPRI ((__force __kernel_rwf_t)0x00000001)
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 0:44 [PATCH 00/11] UFS patches for kernel v5.17 Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 01/11] scsi: ufs: Rename a function argument Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 1:28 ` Chanho Park
2021-11-10 9:48 ` Keoseong Park
2021-11-11 16:59 ` Alim Akhtar
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 02/11] scsi: ufs: Remove is_rpmb_wlun() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 17:47 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-11-11 16:52 ` Alim Akhtar
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 03/11] scsi: ufs: Remove the sdev_rpmb member Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 17:50 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-11-11 16:47 ` Alim Akhtar
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] scsi: ufs: Remove dead code Bart Van Assche
2021-11-11 7:06 ` Avri Altman
2021-11-15 15:58 ` Bean Huo
2021-11-15 16:01 ` Bean Huo
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] scsi: core: Add support for reserved tags Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] scsi: ufs: Rework ufshcd_change_queue_depth() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-11 7:22 ` Avri Altman
2021-11-15 18:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] scsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock in the error handler Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-11 7:33 ` Avri Altman
2021-11-15 18:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 08/11] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling further Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 8:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-10 18:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-12 10:56 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-15 23:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-16 9:03 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-16 16:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-11 9:17 ` Peter Wang
2021-11-16 9:07 ` Peter Wang
2021-11-16 16:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-16 20:16 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-16 21:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-17 7:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 09/11] scsi: ufs: Fix a kernel crash during shutdown Bart Van Assche
2021-11-11 7:48 ` Avri Altman
2021-11-15 18:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 10/11] scsi: ufs: Optimize the command queueing code Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 8:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-10 18:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-11 7:51 ` Avri Altman
2021-11-12 23:40 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-11-10 0:44 ` [PATCH 11/11] scsi: ufs: Implement polling support Bart Van Assche
2021-11-10 1:36 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-11-19 19:39 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-11-11 8:11 ` Avri Altman
2021-11-19 19:01 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=209216ac-878a-3e96-5e8e-eaa92fad7f35@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox