From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] bsg: split handling of SCSI CDBs vs transport requeues Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:46:12 -0600 Message-ID: <251daef6-a5bd-47d1-99a2-24d0d11b7bff@kernel.dk> References: <20171003104845.10417-1-hch@lst.de> <20171003104845.10417-10-hch@lst.de> <20171019155933.GE26185@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> <20171020162630.GA14277@lst.de> <20171020164727.GA26380@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> <20171023062949.GA16978@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:45354 "EHLO mail-it0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751334AbdJXRqQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:46:16 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f45.google.com with SMTP id n195so11025286itg.0 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:46:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig Cc: Benjamin Block , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Thumshirn On 10/23/2017 01:17 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Christoph, > >>> Yes, I expected the bsg bits to go through Jens' tree. >> >> Ok, then I misremembered it, and we'll have to delay the remaining >> patches until the next merge window, as they depend on the previous >> ones. > > I don't mind taking them through SCSI if Jens agrees. I'm fine with that, as long as the last issue Benjamin brought up has been fixed up. -- Jens Axboe