public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 23:25:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28ac4f43-7454-4cfa-b84e-1f9d5e88ae4c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107135153.GB22046@lst.de>



On 1/7/25 7:21 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:53:40PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>> When I applied you patch on my system and access io_poll attribute
>> of one of my nvme disk, I see it returns 1, though I didn't configure 
>> poll queue for the disk. With this patch, as we're now always setting 
>> BLK_FEAT_POLL (under blk_mq_alloc_queue()) it return 1. So when I haven't
>> configured poll queue for NVMe driver, shouldn't it return 0 when I access 
>> /sys/block/nvmeXnY/queue/io_poll ?  
> 
> While that was the case with the previous RFC series it should not be
> the case with this version, as the nvme driver does not enable the
> poll tag set map unless poll queues are enabled.  I also double checked
> that I do not see it on any of my test setups.
> 
Ohk I did install previous RFC series and tested it. 
On another note, with latest patch series, assuming NVMe driver reports polling 
support when it's loaded, accessing io_poll under sysfs reports 1. This is good.
However later resizing queue so that no poll queue is left and I reset the controller
and then access the io_poll it still reports 1. Is this expected? Other than this 
everything else looks fine.

Thanks,
--Nilay

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07  6:30 fix queue freeze and limit locking order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  7:01   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07 18:05     ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07 10:03   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-09 11:19   ` John Garry
2025-01-09 11:24     ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 11:26       ` John Garry
2025-01-07  6:30 ` [PATCH 2/8] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 10:05   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-07 17:58   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  6:30 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:57   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  8:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  9:23       ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07 13:51         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 17:55           ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-01-07  6:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  7:25   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-07  7:51     ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  8:26       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 10:25       ` Ming Lei
2025-01-07 13:49         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  8:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 10:05   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-07 17:58   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  6:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 17:59   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  6:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] nvme: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:58   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  8:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  8:45       ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  8:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  9:29           ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  9:58   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-07 18:00   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  6:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 10:00   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-07 18:01   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-07  6:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] usb-storage:fix " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 10:00   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-07 18:01   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-08  2:21 ` fix queue freeze and limit locking order Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28ac4f43-7454-4cfa-b84e-1f9d5e88ae4c@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox