From: Muneendra Kumar M <muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jsmart2021@gmail.com, emilne@redhat.com, mkumar@redhat.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5] scsi_transport_fc: Added a new sysfs attribute noretries_abort
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:31:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bab689170901076a118204cf05063d5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5469eef-08cf-267a-77e7-5e4a3640f4f3@suse.de>
Hi Hannes,
>
>Hmm. Wouldn't it make more sense to introduce a new port state 'marginal'
>for this? We might >want/need to introduce additional error recovery
>mechanisms here, so having a new state >might be easier in the long run ...
>Additionally, from my understanding the FPIN events will be generated with
>a certain >frequency. So we could model the new 'marginal' state similar to
>the dev_loss_tmo >mechanism; start a timer whenever the 'marginal' state is
>being set, and clear the state back to >'running' if the state hasn't been
>refreshed within that timeframe.
>That would give us an automatic state reset back to running, and quite easy
>to implement from >userland.
Thanks for the review.
I have a small doubt.
When the port state moves from marginal to running state does it mean we
expect a traffic from the path ?
Regards,
Muneendra.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-11 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-05 2:50 [PATCH 0/5] scsi: Support to handle Intermittent errors Muneendra
2020-08-05 2:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] scsi: Added a new macro in scsi_cmnd.h Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05 2:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: Clear state bit SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT of scsi_cmd before start request Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05 2:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] scsi: No retries on abort success Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05 2:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] scsi: Added routine to set SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit for outstanding io on scsi_dev Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05 2:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi_transport_fc: Added a new sysfs attribute noretries_abort Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-11 6:01 ` Muneendra Kumar M [this message]
2020-08-11 6:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-11 7:03 ` Muneendra Kumar M
2020-08-11 14:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-14 5:33 ` Muneendra Kumar M
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bab689170901076a118204cf05063d5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox