From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net (013.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F31C62D2381 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 20:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791403739; cv=none; b=XZP/aaa2WCTaQyxIATDGEJpSJkzY/eWvdd2qJEv3WWlU0EdxCcJf0BsuWUqoai92grkYcMlTBVuqF/hnArqOfVHa/j9fMMNmAKKE9Dp/j4BJwss1f+nCTgtHQHi94CSyvuursyzgpJMvP4IvCRZttpzOC8CSZrFyjXflZasSjkQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791403739; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5VANaEcL5Kzz00z+EXdJnhrvS99SoSmid+KbtSDTuVA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cZrsCCOEVlOUu9QhixogEGBgsnNKQ/xeAFJVsVzisWf16kdw+YiygPBoSXns6volKviLrNZT/xTO8QXPPFu5ooErhxd9h1VB/ksxDwywMqAzrlAU/dk3ju+gwJZPqpvMaVTzTsSRp/JuZcqxwydi1C85IgO2NUlxORCNaLI4b7Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=eMlgsKFx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="eMlgsKFx" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4j0PMs30Pjzlfvps; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 20:08:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1791403734; x=1793995735; bh=OZ6MZk+U1NsvasI4OJzZui42 /A2T1vQUg9tAEeTZkwM=; b=eMlgsKFxNFSSeWsRl5BI1OyNzvAPoxmLjl0US4pF Qw+7gRCT1QDipLbu46aq+UjNCLEH00F6VcVefM3C6FsPy1+R3IF/wtd+FwVdkIMM bUm705PUkfX8NpAEM9kHle65a3xeveGjDgqQzCmdDrhImC3bVxByzB+mwBg8n8PE 1i1ngCD3CbkWBPIMnVIQbyQ3R8iTz19MrPzi/BYaiG1Y6eoWLNReI2k5iLM5OvQ3 K/XQCAtzHhzS58Uffxt7DASUY/cgU2y61koZOTlpQzmM3dvkjVY81C1zsWALfOBv ygUmltyqdINUQw9arb42iSLRCVe0IJBL9OfLva4R4eicTg== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (013.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id xgCCdk-FBHZD; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 20:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPV6:2a00:79e0:2ed2:d:d224:603c:1a28:dc62] (unknown [104.135.182.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4j0PMn6ckzzlfvpb; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 20:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2dbc5f92-10b1-4265-b08f-86b7c49b85b7@acm.org> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 13:08:52 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Split resp_write_dt0() To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry References: <20261007131218.GC30647@lst.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20261007131218.GC30647@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/7/26 6:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 10:07:27PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> + * Returns 0 upon success or -1 with *scsi_status set to a SCSI status code upon > > Overly long line. Hi Christoph, This line should be exactly 80 columns wide. Is that too wide? I'm fine with reformatting this comment but I'm surprised to read that 80 columns is too wide? Thanks, Bart.