From: nitirawa@codeaurora.org
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
Cc: asutoshd@codeaurora.org, cang@codeaurora.org,
stummala@codeaurora.org, vbadigan@codeaurora.org,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
beanhuo@micron.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add a vops to configure VCC voltage level
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:00:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fb825d458fb87a522b4a64370ee83b1@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48fbd86b319697fced61317bd15c4779@codeaurora.org>
On 2021-02-01 14:01, nitirawa@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2021-01-31 19:32, Avri Altman wrote:
>>>
>>> UFS specification allows different VCC configurations for UFS
>>> devices,
>>> for example,
>>> (1)2.70V - 3.60V (For UFS 2.x devices)
>>> (2)2.40V - 2.70V (For UFS 3.x devices)
>>> For platforms supporting both ufs 2.x (2.7v-3.6v) and
>>> ufs 3.x (2.4v-2.7v), the voltage requirements (VCC) is 2.4v-3.6v.
>>> So to support this, we need to start the ufs device initialization
>>> with
>>> the common VCC voltage(2.7v) and after reading the device descriptor
>>> we
>>> need to switch to the correct range(vcc min and vcc max) of VCC
>>> voltage
>>> as per UFS device type since 2.7v is the marginal voltage as per
>>> specs
>>> for both type of devices.
>>>
>>> Once VCC regulator supply has been intialised to 2.7v and UFS device
>>> type is read from device descriptor, we follows below steps to
>>> change the VCC voltage values.
>>>
>>> 1. Set the device to SLEEP state.
>>> 2. Disable the Vcc Regulator.
>>> 3. Set the vcc voltage according to the device type and reenable
>>> the regulator.
>>> 4. Set the device mode back to ACTIVE.
>>>
>>> The above changes are done in vendor specific file by
>>> adding a vops which will be needed for platform
>>> supporting both ufs 2.x and ufs 3.x devices.
>> The flow should be generic - isn't it?
>> Why do you need the entire flow to be vendor-specific?
>> Why not just the parameters vendor-specific?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Avri
>
> Hi Avri,
> This vops change was done as per the below mail thread
> discussion where it was decided to go with vops and
> let vendors handle it, until specs provides more clarity.
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3754995.html
>
> Regards,
> Nitin
Hi Avri,
Please let me know if you have any further comments on this.
Regards,
Nitin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 16:54 [PATCH V1 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add a vops to configure VCC voltage level Nitin Rawat
2021-01-28 16:54 ` [PATCH V1 1/3] scsi: ufs: export api for use in vendor file Nitin Rawat
[not found] ` <DM6PR04MB657574D3D8B99F3A4997D810FCB79@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2021-02-01 8:10 ` nitirawa
2021-01-28 16:54 ` [PATCH V1 2/3] scsi: ufs: add a vops to configure VCC voltage level Nitin Rawat
2021-01-28 16:54 ` [PATCH V1 3/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: configure VCC voltage level in vendor file Nitin Rawat
[not found] ` <DM6PR04MB6575D0348161330D21A9B6C5FCB79@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2021-02-01 8:31 ` [PATCH V1 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add a vops to configure VCC voltage level nitirawa
2021-02-08 10:30 ` nitirawa [this message]
2021-02-08 12:22 ` Avri Altman
2021-02-19 13:29 ` nitirawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fb825d458fb87a522b4a64370ee83b1@codeaurora.org \
--to=nitirawa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vbadigan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox