Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:50:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3049af11-b93e-4849-8cf6-463a27792ae5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921154015.2971990-21-cassel@kernel.org>

On 9/21/26 16:40, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> When logical block provisioning is enabled, a command that writes user
> data marks the region that it wrote in the provisioning map, so that
> GET LBA STATUS reports the region as mapped. resp_write_dt0(),
> resp_write_scat() and resp_write_same() all call map_region() for that.
> 
> resp_atomic_write() does not, so a WRITE ATOMIC (16) leaves the
> provisioning map untouched, and GET LBA STATUS keeps reporting the
> region as deallocated after it has been written. map_state(), which
> GET LBA STATUS uses, is the only reader of the map, so that is the whole
> of the effect.
> 
> Call map_region() the way resp_write_dt0() does, and take the zone
> metadata write lock across the access as it does when logical block
> provisioning is enabled. That lock is what serialises the provisioning
> map against resp_unmap(), which holds it while unmap_region() clears map
> bits and zeroes the data that they cover. resp_unmap() does nothing
> unless logical block provisioning is enabled, so the lock is only needed
> in that case.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Fixes: 84f3a3c01d70 ("scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> ---
> Tested with:
> 
>    modprobe scsi_debug sector_size=512 physblk_exp=3 dev_size_mb=128 \
>        atomic_wr=1 lbpu=1
> 
> GET LBA STATUS reports a region that has never been written as
> deallocated, and reports it as mapped after a WRITE ATOMIC (16) of eight
> blocks. Only an ordinary WRITE did so before this patch.
> ---
> 
> Changes since v4: the meta_data_locked variable is gone, as suggested.
>   drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 10 ++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index d07f6f891951..2e1a02c383a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> @@ -6202,6 +6202,7 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
>   	u8 *cmd = scp->cmnd;
>   	u16 boundary, len;
>   	u64 lba, lba_tmp;
> +	bool lbp = scsi_debug_lbp();
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!scsi_debug_atomic_write()) {
> @@ -6246,7 +6247,16 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> +	if (lbp)
> +		sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);
> +
>   	ret = do_device_access(sip, scp, 0, lba, len, 0, true, true);
> +	if (unlikely(lbp))

Is this supposed to be called if ret <= 0?

> +		map_region(sip, lba, len);
> +
> +	if (lbp)

Ignoring comment above, why not combine into a single if statement?

> +		sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
 > +>   	if (unlikely(ret == -1))
>   		return DID_ERROR << 16;
>   	if (unlikely(ret != len * sdebug_sector_size))


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-21 15:40 [PATCH v5 00/10] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Refuse a zoned device with a non-zero lowest aligned LBA Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Make atomic writes and ZBC emulation mutually exclusive Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Take the zone metadata lock before the data lock Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Evaluate scsi_debug_lbp() only once Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:53   ` John Garry
2026-09-23  9:54   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block to a zoned device Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:50   ` John Garry [this message]
2026-09-24 11:10     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-25  9:32       ` John Garry
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate the access parameters of " Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3049af11-b93e-4849-8cf6-463a27792ae5@linux.dev \
    --to=john.garry@linux.dev \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkp@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox