From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:50:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3049af11-b93e-4849-8cf6-463a27792ae5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921154015.2971990-21-cassel@kernel.org>
On 9/21/26 16:40, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> When logical block provisioning is enabled, a command that writes user
> data marks the region that it wrote in the provisioning map, so that
> GET LBA STATUS reports the region as mapped. resp_write_dt0(),
> resp_write_scat() and resp_write_same() all call map_region() for that.
>
> resp_atomic_write() does not, so a WRITE ATOMIC (16) leaves the
> provisioning map untouched, and GET LBA STATUS keeps reporting the
> region as deallocated after it has been written. map_state(), which
> GET LBA STATUS uses, is the only reader of the map, so that is the whole
> of the effect.
>
> Call map_region() the way resp_write_dt0() does, and take the zone
> metadata write lock across the access as it does when logical block
> provisioning is enabled. That lock is what serialises the provisioning
> map against resp_unmap(), which holds it while unmap_region() clears map
> bits and zeroes the data that they cover. resp_unmap() does nothing
> unless logical block provisioning is enabled, so the lock is only needed
> in that case.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Fixes: 84f3a3c01d70 ("scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> ---
> Tested with:
>
> modprobe scsi_debug sector_size=512 physblk_exp=3 dev_size_mb=128 \
> atomic_wr=1 lbpu=1
>
> GET LBA STATUS reports a region that has never been written as
> deallocated, and reports it as mapped after a WRITE ATOMIC (16) of eight
> blocks. Only an ordinary WRITE did so before this patch.
> ---
>
> Changes since v4: the meta_data_locked variable is gone, as suggested.
> drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index d07f6f891951..2e1a02c383a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> @@ -6202,6 +6202,7 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> u8 *cmd = scp->cmnd;
> u16 boundary, len;
> u64 lba, lba_tmp;
> + bool lbp = scsi_debug_lbp();
> int ret;
>
> if (!scsi_debug_atomic_write()) {
> @@ -6246,7 +6247,16 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> }
> }
>
> + if (lbp)
> + sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);
> +
> ret = do_device_access(sip, scp, 0, lba, len, 0, true, true);
> + if (unlikely(lbp))
Is this supposed to be called if ret <= 0?
> + map_region(sip, lba, len);
> +
> + if (lbp)
Ignoring comment above, why not combine into a single if statement?
> + sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
> +> if (unlikely(ret == -1))
> return DID_ERROR << 16;
> if (unlikely(ret != len * sdebug_sector_size))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 15:40 [PATCH v5 00/10] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Refuse a zoned device with a non-zero lowest aligned LBA Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Make atomic writes and ZBC emulation mutually exclusive Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Take the zone metadata lock before the data lock Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Evaluate scsi_debug_lbp() only once Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:53 ` John Garry
2026-09-23 9:54 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block to a zoned device Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 15:50 ` John Garry [this message]
2026-09-24 11:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-25 9:32 ` John Garry
2026-09-21 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate the access parameters of " Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3049af11-b93e-4849-8cf6-463a27792ae5@linux.dev \
--to=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox