Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@microsemi.com>,
	Scott Teel <scott.teel@microsemi.com>,
	Justin Lindley <justin.lindley@microsemi.com>,
	esc.storagedev@microsemi.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: hpsa: fix uninitialized variable access
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:49:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3179555.Y0kaXrZstW@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04f7cd82-8979-0f08-8b16-3cf863795ccf@suse.com>

On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:47:09 PM CET Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> index 05f7782..ee6f852 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> @@ -2031,7 +2031,7 @@ static struct hpsa_scsi_dev_t
> *lookup_hpsa_scsi_dev(struct ctlr_info *h,
> 
>  static int hpsa_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>  {
> -       struct hpsa_scsi_dev_t *sd;
> +       struct hpsa_scsi_dev_t *sd = NULL;
>         unsigned long flags;
>         struct ctlr_info *h;
> 
> 

I try not to add initializations like this in general, since they
prevent us from finding the bug, but here that seems fine too
as we immediately test it for NULL anyway.

Can you follow up with a patch to do that?

	Arnd


      reply	other threads:[~2016-11-22 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-22 14:32 [PATCH] scsi: hpsa: fix uninitialized variable access Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-22 14:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-22 14:49   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3179555.Y0kaXrZstW@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=esc.storagedev@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=justin.lindley@microsemi.com \
    --cc=kevin.barnett@microsemi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=scott.teel@microsemi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox