From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] scsi: ufs: cleanup ufs initialization path
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 17:11:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3329e7ed6714cd86ec91cca96e5980da1df11f11.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR04MB464078AE07966E53FFB237F5FC8C0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 06:37 +0000, Avri Altman wrote:
> > + /* Get the length of descriptor */
> > + ufshcd_map_desc_id_to_length(hba, desc_id, &buff_len);
> > + if (!buff_len) {
> > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to get desc length",
> > __func__);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > /* Check whether we need temp memory */
>
> The first time we are reading the descriptor, we no longer can rely
> on its true size.
> So for this check, buff_len is 256 and kmalloc will always happen.
> Do you think that this check is still relevant?
>
> /* Check whether we need temp memory */
> if (param_offset != 0 || param_size < buff_len) {
> desc_buf = kmalloc(buff_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!desc_buf)
> return -ENOMEM;
> } else {
> desc_buf = param_read_buf;
> is_kmalloc = false;
> }
Avri
I found this checkup is still needed since LU descriptor read will
multiple enter this function. so I didn't delete it in the new version
patch.
thanks,
Bean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-31 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 16:40 [PATCH v4 0/4] scsi: ufs: cleanup ufs initialization Bean Huo
2020-05-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] scsi: ufs: remove max_t in ufs_get_device_desc Bean Huo
2020-05-29 17:37 ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] scsi: ufs: delete ufshcd_read_desc() Bean Huo
2020-05-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] scsi: ufs: cleanup ufs initialization path Bean Huo
2020-05-30 6:37 ` Avri Altman
2020-05-30 18:38 ` Bean Huo
2020-05-31 15:11 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2020-05-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] scsi: ufs: add compatibility with 3.1 UFS unit descriptor length Bean Huo
2020-05-30 6:56 ` Avri Altman
2020-05-30 18:33 ` Bean Huo
2020-05-30 19:43 ` Avri Altman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3329e7ed6714cd86ec91cca96e5980da1df11f11.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).