From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, mkp@kernel.org
Cc: hare@suse.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, snitzer@kernel.org,
jmeneghi@redhat.com, bmarzins@redhat.com,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, hch@lst.de,
michael.christie@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/29] Native SCSI Multipath support
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:05:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3332329d-b922-45a4-8333-e8353e983885@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b90edc29d5b3be49f5bd0e0ecec5f1701e089bf.camel@redhat.com>
On 11/9/26 20:19, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> I have been testing v9 (your scsi-multipath-v7.4-v9 branch, on
> 7.4-rc1) on real hardware
Good to know.
> and found two problems with ALUA arrays,
> one in scsi_dh_alua and one in the series itself.
>
> Setup:
> - HP P2000 G3 FC array, implicit ALUA, two port groups (one per
> controller)
> - 2 FC HBAs, 2 target ports each, 30 LUNs with 4 paths per LUN
> - scsi_mod.multipath=on, dm-multipath not in use
> - Under dm-multipath, the same LUNs show port group 1 at prio 50
> (active/optimized) and port group 0 at prio 10
> (active/non-optimized)
>
> 1. sdev->access_state is wrong after boot (scsi_dh_alua, not this
> series)
>
> After boot, every path read active/optimized in
> /sys/class/scsi_device/H:C:T:L/device/access_state, while sg_rtpg
> reports port group 0 as active/non-optimized. No
> "alua: port group XX state ..." message was logged at all.
In this series, ALUA state really has been ignored. It was felt that
driving ALUA state and sdev->access_state by device handler ALUA driver
should should not be relied on for Native SCSI multipath. There had been
considerable discussion on this on list. I already have the work done
for ALUA support from some time ago and can be posted once this series
is accepted.
>
> Since 50759b881e1d ("scsi: device_handler: alua: Call
> scsi_device_put() from non-atomic context"), alua_rtpg_queue() only
> queues an RTPG if sdev->handler_data is set, but alua_bus_attach()
> sets handler_data after alua_initialize() has tried to queue the
> initial RTPG. That RTPG is dropped, and access_state stays at its
> zeroed default (active/optimized) until something calls
> scsi_dh_activate(). dm-multipath hides this through pg_init; native
> multipath never calls activate, so the series sees every path as
> optimized.
>
> I have sent a separate fix for this to linux-scsi:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20261109201120.1067815-1-
> loberman@redhat.com/
> It is independent of your series, but without it, native multipath
> on ALUA arrays has no correct path state.
Ack
>
> 2. ANO paths are ranked the same as AO paths
>
> With the ALUA state corrected (by writing "activate" to dh_state, or
> with the fix above), I/O still went to active/non-optimized paths.
> scsi_multipath_sdev_init() sets mpath_device->access_state to
> MPATH_STATE_OPTIMIZED and nothing updates it, while
> __mpath_find_path(), mpath_round_robin_path() and
> mpath_queue_depth_path() rank paths by that field. Only
> scsi_mpath_is_optimized()/is_disabled() read sdev->access_state.
>
> With numa, the first path in dev_list wins for every node, and
> dev_list order follows sd probe completion, so for about a third of
> the LUNs the current path was an ANO path. Example, LUN sdn, reads
> completed per path for a 2000 x 1M O_DIRECT dd (:0/:3 AO, :1/:2 ANO
> at the time):
>
> sdn:0 0sdn:1 2000sdn:2 0sdn:3 0
>
> Every read went through the non-owning controller. From the code, for
> these LUNs the numa recheck of is_optimized() fails on every I/O and
> __mpath_find_path() picks the same ANO path again.
>
> With the change below (a template callback so the selectors use the
> live state), plus the scsi_dh_alua fix, all 30 LUNs pick an AO
> current path at boot, and on LUN sdl (:0/:2 AO, :1/:3 ANO):
>
> numa 2000 0 0 0
> round-robin 1000 0 1000 0
> queue-depth 18039 0 13961 0 (8 parallel dd, 64k)
>
> No I/O reached the ANO paths under any policy. This is a test patch to
> show the problem, not a polished change - feel free to fold it in or
> do it differently.
I'll check it. Sounds like a real problem.
As you may know, this code is really a refactoring of the NVMe multipath
code. The ambition was to have NVMe use libmultipath eventually, so it
would be good for any change to work for both NVMe and SCSI.
>
> 3. Smaller points
>
> - numa with equal NUMA distance uses one path per LUN, so with two AO
> paths through two HBAs, half the optimized bandwidth is idle (sdl:2
> above under numa). That matches NVMe, but users coming from
> dm-multipath service-time will notice. Would round-robin or
> queue-depth be a better default for SCSI?
Maybe, but round-robin may not be always ideal considering only a bio
mode of operation is supported and no merging like dm-mpath RQ mode.
>
> - There are no Documentation/ABI entries for the new sysfs attributes
> (scsi_mpath_device vpd_id/iopolicy/multipath, delayed_removal_secs,
> mpath_dev, mpath_numa_nodes, mpath_queue_depth), and the
> scsi_mod.multipath and multipath_iopolicy parameters are not in
> kernel-parameters.txt. I have a draft ABI file if useful.
Cool, I would suggest to post if and when this is merged. I would rather
not post another version of this series. It is just "experimental".
>
> - There is no userspace tool yet to show heads, paths and ALUA state
> (the equivalent of multipath -ll or nvme list-subsys). I used a
> small sysfs script for this testing. Ben, is native SCSI multipath
> support in multipath-tools planned?
Well, the whole point is that we don't need userspace tools. However, I
appreciate that there is no general SCSI tooling which could help here.
I know that Himanshu M did work on a SCSI version of nvme-cli tool
previously. Martin may know the status of that.
>
> - CONFIG_SCSI_MULTIPATH/CONFIG_LIBMULTIPATH are only enabled in your
> branch's x86_64_defconfig, so building from a distro config leaves
> them off, and scsi_mod.multipath= is silently ignored. Maybe worth a
> note in the cover letter.
I thought that the kernel warns of unrecognised params (which would
happen for a relevant module disabled).
>
> I have not tested failover or path loss yet; I will follow up with
> that and a Tested-by once done.
ok.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 20:47 [PATCH v9 00/29] Native SCSI Multipath support John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 01/29] scsi: core: Clear cmd->flags for terminal queuing error John Garry
2026-11-09 20:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 02/29] libmultipath: Add initial framework John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 03/29] libmultipath: Add basic gendisk support John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 04/29] libmultipath: Add path selection support John Garry
2026-11-08 21:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 05/29] libmultipath: Add bio handling John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 06/29] libmultipath: Add support for mpath_device management John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 07/29] libmultipath: Add delayed removal support John Garry
2026-11-08 21:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 08/29] libmultipath: Add sysfs helpers John Garry
2026-11-08 21:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 09/29] libmultipath: Add support for block device IOCTL John Garry
2026-11-08 21:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 10/29] libmultipath: Add mpath_bdev_getgeo() John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 11/29] libmultipath: Add mpath_bdev_get_unique_id() John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 12/29] scsi-multipath: introduce basic SCSI device support John Garry
2026-11-08 21:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 13/29] scsi-multipath: introduce scsi_device head structure John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 14/29] scsi-multipath: provide sysfs link from to scsi_device John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 15/29] scsi-multipath: support iopolicy John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 16/29] scsi-multipath: clone each bio John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 17/29] scsi-multipath: clear path when device is blocked John Garry
2026-11-08 21:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 18/29] scsi-multipath: revalidate paths upon device unblock John Garry
2026-11-08 21:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 19/29] scsi-multipath: failover handling John Garry
2026-11-08 21:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 20/29] scsi-multipath: provide callbacks for path state John Garry
2026-11-08 21:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 21/29] scsi-multipath: add scsi_mpath_{start,end}_request() John Garry
2026-11-08 21:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 22/29] scsi-multipath: update request for terminal request queuing error John Garry
2026-11-08 21:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 23/29] scsi-multipath: add delayed disk removal support John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 24/29] scsi: sd: add multipath disk class John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 25/29] scsi: sd: add multipath disk attr groups John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 26/29] scsi: sd: support multipath disk John Garry
2026-11-08 21:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 27/29] scsi: sd: add mpath_dev file John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 28/29] scsi: sd: add mpath_numa_nodes dev attribute John Garry
2026-11-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v9 29/29] scsi: sd: add mpath_queue_depth " John Garry
2026-11-09 20:19 ` [PATCH v9 00/29] Native SCSI Multipath support Laurence Oberman
2026-11-10 9:05 ` John Garry [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3332329d-b922-45a4-8333-e8353e983885@linux.dev \
--to=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox