Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] scsi: ufs: qcom: add a new phy calibrate API call

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 4/10/25 11:00 AM, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> Introduce a new phy calibrate API call in the UFS Qualcomm driver to
> separate phy calibration from phy power-on. This change is a precursor
> to the next patchset in this series, which requires these two operations
> to be distinct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 1b37449fbffc..4998656e9267 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -473,6 +473,12 @@ static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  		goto out_disable_phy;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = phy_calibrate(phy);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to calibrate PHY %d\n",

Please add a colon, so that it becomes "..PHY: %d\n"

> +			__func__, ret);
Avoid __func__, this print is fine without it

Shouldn't we fail the power-on if this can't succeed?

Konrad