public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>,
	Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.vom>,
	Steffen Maier <maier@de.ibm.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error: count medium access timeout only once per EH run
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:13:02 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <398739338.37615684.1487859182429.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487845639-73322-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>
> To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>, "James Bottomley" <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
> linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>, "Ewan Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>, "Lawrence Oberman"
> <loberman@redhat.com>, "Benjamin Block" <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.vom>, "Steffen Maier" <maier@de.ibm.com>, "Hannes
> Reinecke" <hare@suse.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 5:27:19 AM
> Subject: [PATCH] scsi_error: count medium access timeout only once per EH run
> 
> The current medium access timeout counter will be increased for
> each command, so if there are enough failed commands we'll hit
> the medium access timeout for even a single failure.
> Fix this by making the timeout per EH run, ie the counter will
> only be increased once per device and EH run.
> 
> Cc: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> Cc: Lawrence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.vom>
> Cc: Steffen Maier <maier@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c |  2 ++
>  drivers/scsi/sd.c         | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/scsi/sd.h         |  1 +
>  include/scsi/scsi.h       |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index f2cafae..481ea1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>  static int scsi_eh_try_stu(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd);
>  static int scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_host_template *,
>  				 struct scsi_cmnd *);
> +static int scsi_eh_action(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, int rtn);
>  
>  /* called with shost->host_lock held */
>  void scsi_eh_wakeup(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> @@ -249,6 +250,7 @@ int scsi_eh_scmd_add(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, int eh_flag)
>  	if (scmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED)
>  		eh_flag &= ~SCSI_EH_CANCEL_CMD;
>  	scmd->eh_eflags |= eh_flag;
> +	scsi_eh_action(scmd, NEEDS_RESET);
>  	list_add_tail(&scmd->eh_entry, &shost->eh_cmd_q);
>  	shost->host_failed++;
>  	scsi_eh_wakeup(shost);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index be535d4..cd9f290 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -1696,12 +1696,21 @@ static int sd_pr_clear(struct block_device *bdev, u64
> key)
>   *	the eh command is passed in eh_disp.  We're looking for devices that
>   *	fail medium access commands but are OK with non access commands like
>   *	test unit ready (so wrongly see the device as having a successful
> - *	recovery)
> + *	recovery).
> + *	We have to be careful to count a medium access failure only once
> + *	per SCSI EH run; there might be several timed out commands which
> + *	will cause the 'max_medium_access_timeouts' counter to trigger
> + *	after the first SCSI EH run already and set the device to offline.
>   **/
>  static int sd_eh_action(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, int eh_disp)
>  {
>  	struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(scmd->request->rq_disk);
>  
> +	if (eh_disp == NEEDS_RESET) {
> +		/* New SCSI EH run, reset gate variable */
> +		sdkp->medium_access_reset = 0;
> +		return eh_disp;
> +	}
>  	if (!scsi_device_online(scmd->device) ||
>  	    !scsi_medium_access_command(scmd) ||
>  	    host_byte(scmd->result) != DID_TIME_OUT ||
> @@ -1715,7 +1724,10 @@ static int sd_eh_action(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, int
> eh_disp)
>  	 * process of recovering or has it suffered an internal failure
>  	 * that prevents access to the storage medium.
>  	 */
> -	sdkp->medium_access_timed_out++;
> +	if (!sdkp->medium_access_reset) {
> +		sdkp->medium_access_timed_out++;
> +		sdkp->medium_access_reset++;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the device keeps failing read/write commands but TEST UNIT
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.h b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> index 4dac35e..19e0bab 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct scsi_disk {
>  	unsigned int	physical_block_size;
>  	unsigned int	max_medium_access_timeouts;
>  	unsigned int	medium_access_timed_out;
> +	unsigned int	medium_access_reset;
>  	u8		media_present;
>  	u8		write_prot;
>  	u8		protection_type;/* Data Integrity Field */
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi.h b/include/scsi/scsi.h
> index a1e1930..b6c750f 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static inline int scsi_is_wlun(u64 lun)
>  #define TIMEOUT_ERROR   0x2007
>  #define SCSI_RETURN_NOT_HANDLED   0x2008
>  #define FAST_IO_FAIL	0x2009
> +#define NEEDS_RESET     0x2010
>  
>  /*
>   * Midlevel queue return values.
> --
> 1.8.5.6
> 
> 

Hello Hannes 
This makes sense to me what you are doing here.
I will also wait for Ewan to weigh in but I wonder if we should make a simple change.
Maybe good to clarify the RESET here by simply changing the name.

Change 
+#define NEEDS_RESET     0x2010
to
+#define MAX_MEDIUM_ERROR_NEEDS_RESET

Of course then also change
+	if (eh_disp == NEEDS_RESET) {
to
+	if (eh_disp == MAX_MEDIUM_ERROR_NEEDS_RESET) {

Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-23 10:27 [PATCH] scsi_error: count medium access timeout only once per EH run Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-23 14:13 ` Laurence Oberman [this message]
2017-02-27 19:33 ` Ewan D. Milne
2017-02-28  3:04   ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-28 10:03   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=398739338.37615684.1487859182429.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.vom \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maier@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox