From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: tonyb@cybernetics.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ide-scsi command status bug
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:36:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D2A3015.9AFB6D9D@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 000301c226c0$ffcd0dc0$e0019d89@cybernetics.com
Tony Battersby wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have tracked down a problem with incorrect status being returned for a
> command sent through sg and ide-scsi. I am using vanilla 2.4.17. Here is
> what is happening:
>
> The device returns CHECK CONDITION for a command sent to it from sg and
> ide-scsi.
> The following line executes in idescsi_end_request() in ide-scsi.c:
> pc->scsi_cmd->result = (CHECK_CONDITION << 1) | (DID_OK << 16);
> ide-scsi calls the callback completion function.
> An internal request sense is queued.
> The request sense completes successfully.
> The following line executes in idescsi_end_request() in ide-scsi.c:
> pc->scsi_cmd->result = (DID_OK << 16)
> ide-scsi calls the callback completion function for the request sense
> command.
>
> In my userspace program, sg_io_hdr_t { status, masked_status } are both
> zero, but sg_io_hdr_t { driver_status } & DRIVER_SENSE is set and the sense
> data is valid. It appears to me as if the status from the request sense
> command overwrote the original CHECK CONDITION status. I verified this by
> forcing all request sense commands to return a status of 0x01 (reserved bit
> set) in idescsi_end_request() in ide-scsi.c, and sure enough, I got a status
> of 0x01 for the failed command in sg_io_hdr_t { status }.
>
> I have not tested any other kernel versions. I am working around the
> problem for now by faking a CHECK CONDITION status when driver_status &
> DRIVER_SENSE in my program.
Tony,
I tried to document around this bug in the sg driver howto:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/SCSI-Generic-HOWTO/x255.html
The ide-scsi driver is probably the only lower level driver that
has this unfortunate property.
It's a minor dilemma for the sg driver: whether to pass through
this information or correct it on the way passed.
Doug Gilbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-09 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-08 20:49 ide-scsi command status bug Tony Battersby
2002-07-09 0:36 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2002-07-17 1:04 ` Luben Tuikov
2002-07-17 13:33 ` Tony Battersby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D2A3015.9AFB6D9D@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox