public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: tonyb@cybernetics.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ide-scsi command status bug
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:36:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D2A3015.9AFB6D9D@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 000301c226c0$ffcd0dc0$e0019d89@cybernetics.com

Tony Battersby wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have tracked down a problem with incorrect status being returned for a
> command sent through sg and ide-scsi.  I am using vanilla 2.4.17.  Here is
> what is happening:
> 
> The device returns CHECK CONDITION for a command sent to it from sg and
> ide-scsi.
> The following line executes in idescsi_end_request() in ide-scsi.c:
> pc->scsi_cmd->result = (CHECK_CONDITION << 1) | (DID_OK << 16);
> ide-scsi calls the callback completion function.
> An internal request sense is queued.
> The request sense completes successfully.
> The following line executes in idescsi_end_request() in ide-scsi.c:
> pc->scsi_cmd->result = (DID_OK << 16)
> ide-scsi calls the callback completion function for the request sense
> command.
> 
> In my userspace program, sg_io_hdr_t { status, masked_status } are both
> zero, but sg_io_hdr_t { driver_status } & DRIVER_SENSE is set and the sense
> data is valid.  It appears to me as if the status from the request sense
> command overwrote the original CHECK CONDITION status.  I verified this by
> forcing all request sense commands to return a status of 0x01 (reserved bit
> set) in idescsi_end_request() in ide-scsi.c, and sure enough, I got a status
> of 0x01 for the failed command in sg_io_hdr_t { status }.
> 
> I have not tested any other kernel versions.  I am working around the
> problem for now by faking a CHECK CONDITION status when driver_status &
> DRIVER_SENSE in my program.

Tony,
I tried to document around this bug in the sg driver howto:
	http://tldp.org/HOWTO/SCSI-Generic-HOWTO/x255.html
The ide-scsi driver is probably the only lower level driver that 
has this unfortunate property.

It's a minor dilemma for the sg driver: whether to pass through
this information or correct it on the way passed.

Doug Gilbert

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-09  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-08 20:49 ide-scsi command status bug Tony Battersby
2002-07-09  0:36 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2002-07-17  1:04 ` Luben Tuikov
2002-07-17 13:33   ` Tony Battersby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D2A3015.9AFB6D9D@torque.net \
    --to=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox