From: ael <law_ence.dev@ntlworld.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: st.c block limits
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 21:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D46F4F4.1090703@ntlworld.com> (raw)
I have a scsi tape drive:-
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: AIWA Model: TD-20001 Rev: 0159
Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
It has worked perfectly for several years, but from kernel 2.4.10 st.c
started to report a 24-bit block limit: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215
bytes. I am now on stock 2.4.18 with static char *verstr = "20020205".
The above drive is a NS-20 drive with default block size of 512 and 20G
blocks: so a range of 25 bits for the block number is needed.
So when I attempt to write to the tape beyond block 2^24,
I get an error like:
# tar -cf /dev/ntape blah_home.tar.bz2; mt tell
tar: /dev/ntape: Wrote only 0 of 10240 bytes
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
At block 17832312.
With:
kernel: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
in the kernel log.
Now I *think* that I used to write to the end of tapes without hitting this
2^24 block limit. I guess that I can work around by setting a larger block
size. But is there a fix? Or is the 24-bit limit built into the scsi tape
protocol? Since I used to fill 2 tapes to complete a backup, I must have
written beyond block (2^24 -1).
Sorry if this is an FAQ. I did google and found nothing directly relevant.
When did st.c change and why? I did turn on DEBUG, and I append a few
entries, although I am not sure that it helps much:
Jul 30 16:49:28 conquest3 kernel: st: Version 20020205, bufsize 32768, wrt
30720, max init. bufs 4, s/g segs 16
Jul 30 16:49:28 conquest3 kernel: Attached scsi tape st0 at scsi0, channel
0, id 0, lun 0
Jul 30 16:49:28 conquest3 kernel: st: Allocated tape buffer 0 (32768 bytes,
1 segments, dma: 1, a: c01e8000).
Jul 30 16:49:28 conquest3 kernel: st: segment sizes: first 32768, last
32768 bytes.
drwx------ 2 ael ael 4096 Nov 3 2001 Mail
Jul 30 16:49:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
Jul 30 16:49:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Mode sense. Length 11, medium 85,
WBS 10, BLL 8
Jul 30 16:49:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Density 0, tape length: 0, drv buffer: 1
Jul 30 16:49:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Block size: 512, buffer size: 32768
(64 blocks).
After switching to 1K blocks and fsf'ing past existing data:-
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jul 30 17:28:50 conquest3 kernel: st0: Setting block size to 1024 bytes.
Jul 30 17:28:50 conquest3 kernel: st0: Rewinding tape.
Jul 30 17:28:52 conquest3 kernel: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
Jul 30 17:28:52 conquest3 kernel: st0: Mode sense. Length 11, medium 85,
WBS 10, BLL 8
Jul 30 17:28:52 conquest3 kernel: st0: Density 0, tape length: 0, drv buffer: 1
Jul 30 17:28:52 conquest3 kernel: st0: Block size: 1024, buffer size: 32768
(32 blocks).
Jul 30 17:28:52 conquest3 kernel: st0: Rewinding tape.
Jul 30 17:29:36 conquest3 kernel: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
Jul 30 17:29:36 conquest3 kernel: st0: Mode sense. Length 11, medium 85,
WBS 10, BLL 8
Jul 30 17:29:36 conquest3 kernel: st0: Density 0, tape length: 0, drv buffer: 1
Jul 30 17:29:36 conquest3 kernel: st0: Block size: 1024, buffer size: 32768
(32 blocks).
Jul 30 17:29:36 conquest3 kernel: st0: Spacing tape forward over 12 filemarks.
Jul 30 17:32:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
Jul 30 17:32:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Mode sense. Length 11, medium 85,
WBS 10, BLL 8
Jul 30 17:32:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Density 0, tape length: 0, drv buffer: 1
Jul 30 17:32:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Block size: 1024, buffer size: 32768
(32 blocks).
Jul 30 17:32:28 conquest3 kernel: st0: Got tape pos. blk 17832312 part 0.
Thanks in advance for any help
ael
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-30 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-30 20:20 ael [this message]
2002-08-01 4:45 ` st.c block limits Kai Makisara
2002-08-01 11:46 ` ael
2002-08-01 13:14 ` Tony Battersby
2002-08-01 15:49 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-08-01 22:51 ` ael
2002-08-01 11:57 ` ael
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-01 16:06 Bryan Henderson
2002-08-01 16:53 Bryan Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D46F4F4.1090703@ntlworld.com \
--to=law_ence.dev@ntlworld.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox