From: Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>
To: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Q: eh_abort_handler and Task Management
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:45:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DBE3C92.964AA3C0@splentec.com> (raw)
Wouldn't it make sense to stupulate that the eh_abort_handler()
should NOT call scsi_done() for the command (even with DID_ABORT)?
This behaviour would be consistent with SAM-3 Task Management,
in that when aborted no response should be returned.
--
Luben
reply other threads:[~2002-10-29 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DBE3C92.964AA3C0@splentec.com \
--to=luben@splentec.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).