* Q: eh_abort_handler and Task Management
@ 2002-10-29 7:45 Luben Tuikov
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Luben Tuikov @ 2002-10-29 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
Wouldn't it make sense to stupulate that the eh_abort_handler()
should NOT call scsi_done() for the command (even with DID_ABORT)?
This behaviour would be consistent with SAM-3 Task Management,
in that when aborted no response should be returned.
--
Luben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-29 7:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-29 7:45 Q: eh_abort_handler and Task Management Luben Tuikov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).