Re: [PATCH] scsi sysfs update (upper 2/3)

Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-08T04:53:05Z

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:21:58PM -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Is the disagreement the function name, bus name, or the concept of
> registering these drivers with sysfs?

Well, they're not really busses, and I hate misleading analogies :)

No, my real issues is that the scsi_devices should be attached to
a bus hanging of the HBA, as that's what they physically do, not of
some pseudo-bus for the higherlevel devices.

> Do you see a problem with "scsi_upper_driver_register" being added now?

I'd prefer if we'd let it stay as-is for now.