From: Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] scsi-misc-2.5 software enqueue when can_queue reached
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:17:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E639C1E.7060000@splentec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030302085728.A11407@infradead.org
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
[cut]
>>+{
>>+ struct scsi_cmnd *scmd;
>>+ unsigned long flags;
>>+
>>+ spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
>>+ while (!shost->host_self_blocked
>>+ && !list_empty(&shost->pending_queue)) {
>
>
> Linux codingstyle sais the && should be before the line break.
Actually there's a point to this.
Vision research has shown that the human eye doesn't scan/parse
more than 5% to 15% of the beginning of text lines when
searching for an item.
When a binary logical operator is on the continued (second)
line of the if test, the brain automatically assumes that
this is a _continuation_ of the logical condition -- since
no valid C language line starts _with_ a _binary logical op_.
But if the binary logical op were on the previous line, then
the next line would look just like a normal line and one would
_have_ to look at the previous line to see if it ends with `}' or
`;'.
There's a book called "C Style: Standards and Guidelines" by
David Straker, (C) 1992, Prentice Hall, ISBN: 0-13-116898-3.
More information can be found therein.
--
Luben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-03 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-28 19:19 [RFC][PATCH] scsi-misc-2.5 software enqueue when can_queue reached Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-02 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-03-02 18:15 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-03 15:52 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-03 18:17 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2003-03-04 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-04 4:49 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-02 20:57 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-02 21:08 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-03 20:52 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-03 22:40 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-03 23:41 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-04 5:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-05 3:02 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-05 18:43 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-06 15:57 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-06 17:41 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-06 18:04 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E639C1E.7060000@splentec.com \
--to=luben@splentec.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox