From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Douglas Gilbert Subject: Re: Problem with aacraid driver in 2.5.63-bk-latest Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:55:02 +1000 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3E6FC8D6.7090005@torque.net> References: <20030228133037.GB7473@jiffies.dk> <1047510381.12193.28.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net> <1047514681.23725.35.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Reply-To: dougg@torque.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Mark Haverkamp , Christoffer Hall-Frederiksen , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux aacraid devel Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:06, Mark Haverkamp wrote: > >>During probe, scsi_alloc_sdev is called. It calls >>scsi_adjust_queue_depth with the cmd_per_lun value. >>scsi_adjust_queue_depth returns without doing anything if the tags value >>is greater than 256. This leaves the Scsi_Device queue_depth at zero. >>Later when an I/O is queued, scsi_request_fn checks for device_busy >= >>queue_depth. If so, the function does a break and exits. This is where >>it hangs. >> >>To get things to load I set cmd_per_lun to 256. I don't know if the is >>the correct way to deal with the problem. Maybe someone else can say >>something about that. > > > If the SCSI layer is trying to be clever by ignoring the requested 512 > then thats the actual problem. 512 is the right value because its not > really a disk you are talking to on the main channel. So the scsi layer > ought to honour it. Here is the relevant code snippet in scsi.c around line 930: void scsi_adjust_queue_depth(Scsi_Device *SDpnt, int tagged, int tags) { static spinlock_t device_request_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; unsigned long flags; /* * refuse to set tagged depth to an unworkable size */ if(tags <= 0) return; /* * Limit max queue depth on a single lun to 256 for now. Remember, * we allocate a struct scsi_command for each of these and keep it * around forever. Too deep of a depth just wastes memory. */ if(tags > 256) return; .... [pardon the wrap] Now scsi_device::queue_depth is an unsigned short so that is not a problem. Also the comment prior to the "if (tags > 256)" is no longer correct (I think). So perhaps it can be changed to "if (tags > 65535) ..." Doug Gilbert