public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: Re: [patch for playing] 2.5.65 patch to support > 256 disks
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:00:33 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E7C4251.4010406@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200303211056.04060.pbadari@us.ibm.com

Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Andries Brouwer recently submitted 32 bit dev_t patches,
> which are in 2.5.65-mm2. This patch applies on those patches to support 
> more than 256 disks.  This is for playing only.
> 
> I tested this with 4000 disks using scsi_debug. I attached my actual
> disks (50) after 4000 scsi_debug disks. I am able to access my disks
> fine and do IO on them.
> 
> Problems (so far):
> 
> 1) sd.c -  sd_index_bits[] arrys became big - need to be fixed.
> 
> 2) 4000 disks eats up lots of low memory (~460 MB). Here is the
> /proc/meminfo output before & after insmod.
> 
> Before:
> MemTotal:      3883276 kB
> MemFree:       3808028 kB
> Buffers:          3240 kB
> Cached:          41860 kB
> SwapCached:          0 kB
> Active:          45360 kB
> Inactive:         7288 kB
> HighTotal:     3014616 kB
> HighFree:      2961856 kB
> LowTotal:       868660 kB
> LowFree:        846172 kB
> SwapTotal:     2040244 kB
> SwapFree:      2040244 kB
> Dirty:             192 kB
> Writeback:           0 kB
> Mapped:          14916 kB
> Slab:             7164 kB
> Committed_AS:    12952 kB
> PageTables:        312 kB
> ReverseMaps:      1895
> ====
> After:
> MemTotal:      3883276 kB
> MemFree:       3224140 kB
> Buffers:          3880 kB
> Cached:         140376 kB
> SwapCached:          0 kB
> Active:          47512 kB
> Inactive:       105508 kB
> HighTotal:     3014616 kB
> HighFree:      2838144 kB
> LowTotal:       868660 kB
> LowFree:        385996 kB
> SwapTotal:     2040244 kB
> SwapFree:      2040244 kB
> Dirty:              92 kB
> Writeback:           0 kB
> Mapped:          16172 kB
> Slab:           464364 kB
> Committed_AS:    14996 kB
> PageTables:        412 kB
> ReverseMaps:      2209

Badari,
I poked around looking for data on the size issue.
Here are the byte sizes for the per device and per host
structures in scsi_debug and the scsi mid level for
i386, non-smp in lk 2.5.65:
   sizeof(sdebug_dev_info)=60, sizeof(scsi_device)=376
     sizeof(sdebug_host_info)=24, sizeof(Scsi_Host)=224

So for 4000 disks they should be responsible for about
2 MB.

The scsi_cmd_cache slab info went from this before those
84 pseudo disks were added:
# cat slabinfo_pre.txt
scsi_cmd_cache         3     11    356    1    1    1 :   32   16 : 
22     301     6    5    0    0   43 :   3235     31   3264      0
to this afterwards:
# cat slabinfo_post.txt
scsi_cmd_cache        44     55    356    5    5    1 :   32   16 : 
66     398    12    7    0    0   43 :   5837     40   5833      0

I did notice a rather large growth of nodes
in sysfs. For 84 added scsi_debug pseudo disks the number
of sysfs nodes went from 686 to 3347.

Does anybody know what is the per node memory cost of sysfs?

Doug Gilbert




  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-22 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-21 18:56 [patch for playing] 2.5.65 patch to support > 256 disks Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-22 11:00 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2003-03-22 11:04   ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-22 11:46     ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-22 12:05       ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-24 21:32         ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-24 22:22           ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-24 22:54             ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-25  0:10           ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-24 22:57             ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-25 10:56         ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 11:23           ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 11:37             ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 11:39           ` Nick Piggin
2003-03-25 12:01             ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 12:12               ` Nick Piggin
2003-03-25 12:35                 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-27  0:29                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-27  9:18                     ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-28 17:04                       ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-28 18:41                         ` Andries Brouwer
2003-03-29  1:39                           ` Badari Pulavarty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E7C4251.4010406@torque.net \
    --to=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox