public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>
To: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.x use list_head to handle scsi starved request queues
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:15:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E7F837E.9020900@splentec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030324135640.A12273@beaverton.ibm.com

Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> 
> The current code in scsi_queue_next_request() assume queue_lock ==
> host_lock, as does code in scsi_error.c. We get a queue_lock (or
> host_lock), and then iterate over different q's calling
> __blk_run_queue(q).

1. Please don't speak of queue_lock and host_lock as if they are
the same thing.  They are NOT, even though one points to the other.
This is an infrastructure bug and will have to go.

2. Yes I see this in scsi_error.c. How did this ever slip in!
(yes this is NOT a question, but a statement)

-- 
Luben



  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-24 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-20  2:27 [PATCH] 2.5.x use list_head to handle scsi starved request queues Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-20 20:05 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-21  4:39   ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-21 20:48     ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-22  0:50       ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-24 17:12         ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-24 19:29           ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-24 20:20             ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-24 20:25               ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-24 20:38                 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-24 21:25                   ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-24 21:56                     ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-24 22:15                       ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2003-03-24 21:30                 ` Luben Tuikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E7F837E.9020900@splentec.com \
    --to=luben@splentec.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox