From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi-misc-2.5 remove scsi_scan.c EVPD code
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 15:58:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB74EEA.7030300@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030505211158.A14613@beaverton.ibm.com>
Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:39:24AM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>
>>Patrick Mansfield wrote:
<snip/>
>>Another approach could be to have a device node for
>>the scsi mid level (e.g. /dev/scsi) with an ioctl
>>that takes a device's toplogical address and some
>>parameters (e.g. VPD_83) and yields the response
>>of that INQUIRY (or yields an scsi status and a
>>sense buffer).
>
>
> Can something like that be done for a /dev/sg today? It would be very
> useful, not only for VPD/id like commands, but also for user level
> scanning.
It can be. There are a few details to be worked out.
In lk 2.4 for example the sg driver is not initialized
if there are no SCSI devices. That would cause a chicken
and egg type situation if sg was used to do user level
scanning to find the first scsi device. What major/minor
should /dev/sg have? (It could be a misc device and get
a minor reserved).
> That is open some /dev/sg via an ioctl (or ?) attach it to a nexus. If
> there is an existing scsi_device with a matching nexus, it can attach to
> it, else create an sdev via scsi_alloc_sdev, attach to it and go.
>
> Then we can send whatever commands we want via current sg interfaces.
Sounds good. Only allow /dev/sg to have one nexus at
a time "open" (per file descriptor)? Could it
delete an existing nexus?
Doug Gilbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-06 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-25 0:47 [PATCH] scsi-misc-2.5 remove scsi_scan.c EVPD code Andries.Brouwer
2003-05-05 7:58 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-05 14:17 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-05 15:52 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 16:14 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-05 16:26 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-05-05 16:57 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 17:01 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-05 16:38 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-05-05 16:59 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-05 17:46 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 22:51 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-05-06 1:39 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-06 4:11 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-05-06 5:58 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2003-05-06 21:11 ` Patrick Mansfield
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-25 0:22 Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EB74EEA.7030300@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox