From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: "do ata" scsi command? Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:46:38 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3EC515EE.20107@pobox.com> References: <20030515230223.GA516@gtf.org> <20030516060324.GT812@suse.de> <3EC509A1.10503@pobox.com> <20030516160502.GE812@suse.de> <3EC51235.8090701@pobox.com> <20030516163558.GH812@suse.de> <3EC514AD.4000504@pobox.com> <20030516164320.GK812@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:48330 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264492AbTEPQeE (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 12:34:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030516164320.GK812@suse.de> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > As I wrote in the last email, I think this is about the ugliest idea (or > close to) I've ever heard. You can't just go around making up opcodes. That's the purpose of vendor-specific opcode ranges. Jeff