From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [bk patches] move scsi headers Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 01:19:36 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3ED2F568.7060501@pobox.com> References: <20030527034239.GA16376@gtf.org> <20030527061444.A1905@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:54217 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263452AbTE0FGe (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 01:06:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030527061444.A1905@infradead.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 11:42:39PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>James, please do a >> >> bk pull bk://kernel.bkbits.net/jgarzik/scsi-misc-2.5 > > > Also I already told you that the header organisation is crap. include/scsi > exists for a reason, the scsi.h/host.h split is broken and scsi_obsolete.h > should go away not moved around. > > If you want to do something useful you could start removing scsi_obsolete.h, > make the scsi core and scsi.h/hosts.h clean of the obsolete typedefs first. This is too ambitious this close to 2.6-pre, and there is also disagreement about use of include/scsi. I took the minimal patch. As we are very close to 2.6-pre, your suggestions may even want waiting until 2.7. I'll leave it up to James... Consider this a first step. The world does not change in a day :) Jeff