From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [bk patches] move scsi headers Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 01:40:58 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3ED2FA6A.8040902@pobox.com> References: <20030527034239.GA16376@gtf.org> <20030527061444.A1905@infradead.org> <3ED2F568.7060501@pobox.com> <20030527063513.A2357@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:61899 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263516AbTE0F14 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 01:27:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030527063513.A2357@infradead.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:19:36AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>This is too ambitious this close to 2.6-pre, > > > No, it's not. Eihet we do it properly or not at all. Having to use > different headers for 2.4,2.6and 2.7/2.8 is just extremly stupid. I'm going to send my patch to Marcelo too, since it doesn't break anything, and greatly reduces include annoyance for in-tree drivers outside drivers/scsi. > Also we have more intrusive stuff in scsi pending, 2.6.pre or not. We'll see what akpm says... Jeff