From: Luben Tuikov <tluben@rogers.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make the SCSI mid-layer obey the device online flag
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 12:02:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EE0BB0F.5010208@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1054912742.1778.25.camel@mulgrave>
James Bottomley wrote:
> Surprise ejection:
>
> driver starts returning DID_NO_CONNECT to commands
> possibly hotplug notify of surprise ejection
> device->online to be reset
> command queue drains
> command queue drops to zero, ->remove can be called and everything
> cleaned up from user level (including remove-single-device)
>
> Nice ejection:
>
> hotplug notify of ejection request
> eject script cleans up, unmounts, possibly resets online
> command queue drains
> command queue drops to zero, ->remove can be called and everything
> cleaned up from user level (including remove-single-device)
> ejection may now proceed
Exactly right! (This is ``ejection'' of a device off the SAN.)
> For the remove_host scenario, it would be convenient just to do
> nice/surprise ejections on all the devices (from user level) and then do
> the clean up when the hosts device count falls to zero. That may imply
> some type of host->offline flag which disallows the addition of new scsi
> devices to the host.
Just to be clear: this is when a PCI host (SCSI portal) becomes
unavailable. (quite different from the above)
In which case SCSI host should NOT call the queuecommand
(it being a property of the portal) and if user space drivers submit
commands to a device there of or the host, SCSI Core should return said
commands with response SERVICE DELIVERY OR TARGET FAILURE (this is NOT
the status SAM_xxx).
--
Luben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-06 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-04 16:01 [PATCH] make the SCSI mid-layer obey the device online flag James Bottomley
2003-06-04 16:51 ` Mike Anderson
2003-06-04 19:14 ` James Bottomley
2003-06-05 0:34 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-06-05 12:59 ` James Bottomley
2003-06-05 13:41 ` Alan Stern
2003-06-06 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-06 15:19 ` James Bottomley
2003-06-06 15:51 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-06 16:02 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2003-06-06 15:28 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-06-06 15:39 ` James Bottomley
2003-06-06 15:52 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-06-06 16:04 ` James Bottomley
2003-06-06 20:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-06 23:27 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-06-06 23:43 ` James Bottomley
2003-06-07 5:20 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-06-06 20:23 ` Mike Anderson
2003-06-06 20:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-10 0:00 ` Mike Anderson
2003-06-06 20:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-06 23:21 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EE0BB0F.5010208@rogers.com \
--to=tluben@rogers.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox