From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: use_10_for_ms revisited? Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:33:01 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3EFF14BD.3030406@pobox.com> References: <3EFE8784.4000101@pobox.com> <20030629102222.GA14962@win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:46480 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265697AbTF2QSy (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:18:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030629102222.GA14962@win.tue.nl> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andries Brouwer Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Andries Brouwer wrote: > The firmware of existing devices is not magically updated when > a new draft standard is released. So reading yesterdays version > gives very little information on the real world. I'm not implying otherwise... I just think a hueristic can be found that works with these devices. > [And no, none of my USB devices announces MMC-4 compliance.] Would you mind posting the first 8 bytes of any of these USB storage devices' INQUIRY pages? Jeff