From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Harald Dunkel <harri@synopsys.COM>,
USB Storage List <usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.0-test1: random errors for USB disk
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:58:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F16FFD0.9070905@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0307171520390.1251-100000@ida.rowland.org>
Alan Stern wrote:
> The information in your system logs is very clear. Your USB drive worked
> just great until it received a big data transfer.
>
> Under 2.4, the largest WRITE transfer was 130048 bytes and it worked fine.
> Under 2.6, the largest attempted WRITE transfer was 524288 bytes and it
> crashed the drive. The two commands were otherwise identical.
Just to clarify: there's another difference, and that's that 2.4 does
doing that smaller write one page at a time (write, wait, write, wait,...)
while 2.6 does it all at once (write, write, write, write, ... wait).
That difference is how I've seen usb-storage top 30 MByte/sec on USB
with 2.6 kernels, when 2.4 may not reach 10 MB/sec on the same hardware.
- Dave
> Presumably differences in the block I/O systems account for the difference
> in buffer sizes. But I don't know of any way to tell Linux that the drive
> is unable to accept data transfers larger than some fixed limit.
>
> Can anyone else suggest a way to solve this?
>
> Alan Stern
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-17 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3F16D933.2080607@Synopsys.COM>
2003-07-17 19:34 ` [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.0-test1: random errors for USB disk Alan Stern
2003-07-17 19:58 ` David Brownell [this message]
2003-07-17 20:47 ` Harald Dunkel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F16FFD0.9070905@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=harri@synopsys.COM \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox