From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josef =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6llers?= Subject: Re: Why REPORT LUN only for SCSI-2? Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:38:13 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3F1795D5.F1FBECFB@fujitsu-siemens.com> References: <3F140D30.D2B5C4D8@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20030715073927.A8218@beaverton.ibm.com> <3F14F7FA.BA551505@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20030716123519.A19244@beaverton.ibm.com> <3F16649C.239EC87B@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20030717184909.GD2520@nbkurt.garloff.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from plam.fujitsu-siemens.com ([217.115.66.9]:65323 "EHLO plam.fujitsu-siemens.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271722AbTGRGXA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 02:23:00 -0400 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Kurt Garloff Cc: Patrick Mansfield , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Wichert, Gerhard" Kurt Garloff wrote: > > As a side note (probably starting a new thread) why does BLIST_LARG= ELUN > > override max_scsi_luns? >=20 > It shouldn't. Did I really do this? (... checking 2.4 code ...) > No, I plead innocent. Oops, I didn't check the info I got from a third party or I should go and wash my ears B-{( It's SPARSELUN which overrides max_scsi_luns: if (bflags & BLIST_SPARSELUN) { *max_dev_lun =3D shpnt->max_lun; *sparse_lun =3D 1; return 1; } The objection still stands ... --=20 Josef M=F6llers (Pinguinpfleger bei FSC) If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize -- T. Pratchett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html