From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] move some constants around Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:17:14 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3F6CA7BA.8080701@pobox.com> References: <20030920133335.GA23251@lst.de> <20030920185037.A3530@pclin040.win.tue.nl> <20030920181149.GA26141@lst.de> <20030920203458.A3552@pclin040.win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:38091 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261342AbTITTR2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:17:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030920203458.A3552@pclin040.win.tue.nl> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andries Brouwer Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Andries Brouwer wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:11:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > >>The current design purpose of include/scsi/ is to be for the kernel >>only. glibc has it's own scsi/ headers. and drivers/scsi/scsi.h >>is going away completly (slowly). > > > Yes, I see that that is what you are doing. > Pity. > > One of the projects that has been delayed far too much is the > project of giving Linux headers that can be used in user space. > There were only few of those. > > Now you are polluting even those few. Yes. Oh well :( More work for me, when I tackle that project... Jeff