From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xose Vazquez Perez Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.23-pre8: link error with both megaraid drivers Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:27:07 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3F989C0B.9040309@wanadoo.es> References: <3F97F35D.30101@wanadoo.es> <20031023195223.GI11807@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel , linux-scsi List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:27:25PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> IMO this patch makes a better job. It only allows one in kernel, >> and it allows two modules at same time. > My patch allows this, too, or what did I miss? Nothing. But your patch adds too much complex code to do a single thing ;-) > The difference between your and my patch is that your patch doesn't > allow one in kernel plus the other one modular. Yes. And IMO there is not need to build a module when you get the other statically inside the kernel. I can not imagine what will happen if one is statically inside the kernel and someone try to load a module :-) -- HTML mails are going to trash automatically